I mean, Russia currently has the second strongest military in Russia so the answer is no.
Ukraine
News and discussion related to Ukraine
Community Rules
πΊπ¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
π»π€’No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
π₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
π·Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW
β Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
π³ Defense Aid π₯
π³ Humanitarian Aid βοΈβοΈ
πͺ Volunteer with the International Legionnaires
See also:
@MrMakabar https://slrpnk.net/post/22427903
Probably not much left there. The tents in Finland only serve the purpose of pulling wool, snow or tent cloth over NATO's eyes. If Ukraine would pull a decent size army together and invade Russia beyond the initial border, they would probably pretty much have free range. They would need a lot of anti-aircraft tools as that would be the only real fightback available to the Russians. Just think Wagner's 'jump' from Rostov to Moscow.
There are tanks and so forth near Finland and Estonia as well. However everything else is empty, which is unusual. In normal times Russia has its forces deeper inside the country, so they are not destroyed at the first day of a potential invasion and more importantly to defend Moscow in case of a coupe. Given what Wagner did Moscow not having many soldiers around it, is certainly a bold choice.