this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
222 points (100.0% liked)

no context

1691 readers
238 users here now

A place for posting anything out of context. Please caption any posts PIC

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Appears to be legit colourised image and not ai slop. The sharpness of the image threw me.

Preview of black and white photo on alamy.

Apparently was colourised by /u/mygrapefruit.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

The quality you can get by scanning film is insane (assuming it’s been preserved correctly)

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I’m kinda able to pick up context here from several very subtle clues, not gonna lie 😬

[–] ITguru@feddit.nl 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

He done fucked up.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

That's not very typical, I'd like to make that point.

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Building in the background is at 1001 R St NW, Washington, DC 20001.

It looks like the road (and fence) have been removed and the intersection is now a 3-way.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Who doesn’t love a three way?

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 18 points 5 days ago

Can't park there mate

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 days ago

That was an expensive sound. At least a hundred dollars.

[–] Cooljimy84@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why is one of the wheels missing its snow chain ?!?

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago

Probably a reason of the crash I guess

[–] NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

If my wiki-searching is right, those vehicles were rear-wheel drive.

So, it only needed chains on the rear tires.

Preferable to have them on the front tires too, but not required.

The front left might have fallen off while he was driving, or he might have only had the third one to begin with (possibly as an extra) and added it for additional traction in these poor conditions (but it wasn’t enough).

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

That wrought iron fence wasn't having any of it.

[–] glups@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

Oh no, my horseless wagon

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not a forensic carologist but it almost looks like he got t-boned (old fashioned style at 25mph, of course) and lost control (at a brisk 27mph) and hit the fence

[–] burntrealm@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's hard to make fun of them when they were driving a 1500 lb steel box on what are essentially bicycle tires, hah. I imagine they have no grip whatsoever

[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

So they were aware of the icy conditions and applied chains on 2 (3?) of the tires. I wonder what's the story behind the rest not being covered (in case of the obvious "no more chain" scenario, what was the idea behind the diagonal alignment).

[–] Ironfacebuster@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Bicycle tires with round nubbin tread! It looks like they're just about bald too, which I'm sure didn't help

I wonder if there's a way to bring that tread style to the modern world, it looks really interesting compared to what we have now (minus the baldness)

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Look up yonder, it's old McPhee, he's having a few, he can hardly see.. Wrapped his buggy around a tree, someone call the Mounties!

"I know what's wrong with it! Ain't got no gas in it!"

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago

“Well, there’s your problem.”