this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
66 points (98.5% liked)

news

24117 readers
1029 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 8 points 23 hours ago

never forget that what the united states did against north korea constitutes a genocide and the usa has never admitted this

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember to always have a materialist view of the World, stupid Ayatollah issued a Fatwa against the creation of a Nuke.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Juche is definitely not materialist. I support the DPRK having nukes and have the strongest condemnation for anyone suggesting disarmament, but I think it comes down to factors other than materialism that they have maintained the correct approach here.

[–] rentasonder@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"anti-revisionist"

joined 1 day ago.

Welcome back Wisconcom.

https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Comrade:Wisconcom

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net -1 points 19 hours ago

I appreciate your vigilance, but this is an alt for a different user. There are more things in Heaven and Earth than exist in prolewiki/lemmygrad drama.

I'm not like a Hoxhaist or anything, unlike Bland. I wasn't linking the article for the cursory defense of Albania, but the collection of direct quotes from official DPRK publications that directly contradict the most basic ideas of Marxism. Maybe I should have specified, but it just seemed to me like that aspect was obviously irrelevant.

I'm probably not helping your view of me, but I don't think the DPRK even counts as revisionist, because a revisionist is someone who claims the mantle of Marxism and involves specifically Marxist concepts, but also warps or contradicts basic premises of it. The DPRK more or less stopped claiming to be Marxist in the '90s and it's also very difficult to identify anything about them that is specifically Marxist (or even socialist, since they explicitly support the permanent perpetuation of class society) rather than a more generic national liberation project with certain strong progressive elements. The article goes over all of this in a way that is, as far as I can tell, pretty irrefutable.

It's not like I don't support them; I think that if they are able to keep surviving and their bellicose turn over the last few years (relative to the RoK, not Ukraine, though obviously the latter is motivated by the former) doesn't spell their destruction, they will probably represent a historically progressive force for the rest of my life, though that recent turn is kind of a distressing deviation from their entire previous history since the unofficial end of the Korean War. I could also make harsher criticisms, but they are off-topic because the subject at hand is materialism, and I only intended to address an inaccuracy and not disparage people who have been fighting for their lives as a geopolitically progressive force for 70+ years. If someone was repeating reactionary myths about them (for example, about Laura Ling or any of the ~5 American so-called "hostages" arrested since the war -- all blatant criminals) I would refute them just as readily, if not more so.

If you can educate me on this subject and show me the error of my ways, I would truly love to be incorrect. That said, I do have a real interest in the DPRK and am not just mouthing off because the Kims won't press the communism button.

[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 23 points 1 day ago
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Okay PLEASE don't freak out on me, but at 1:09 to about 1:12 of the video, it looks like Kim squeezes his wife (?) 's butt. That's his wife, right, please say yes.

[–] Coca_Cola_but_Commie@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Standing up and screaming “Kim Jong Un wife guy!” as loudly as I can in celebratory triumph in the break room.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

He loves his wife and now you know.

Kim is an ass man, confirmed.

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

PHEW I got super fucking scared and worried. Kim can have a little pinch his wife's butt as a treat.

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kim can have a little pinch his wife's butt as a treat.

exactly , as well as he can spend quality time with his daughter ,with the reason for it is pictured in the Backround.

Hell yeah, seems those crowd jumping jacks really got Kim's blood pumping!

[–] dead@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He spends most of the video walking around with his daughter. It might be his daughter. His daughter is 12 years old. The girl on the stage and in front of the car is his daughter.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think his kid looks like her mom and that's why I got confused and started to despair that please god don't let Kim be a creep too like Sleepy Joe and Drumpf.

[–] dead@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm not convinced that it's his wife. You can watch the full 30 minute video below. The scene in question is around 33 minutes. I've seen his daughter wear that shiny brown jacket in many photos. This car scene also features the shiny brown jacket.

https://xcancel.com/NatalieRevolts/status/1912589268909969738#m

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

No way that his 12 years daughter is that tall, she looks like a young woman.

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BanSwitch2Buyers@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think Kim Jong Un is a wife guy?

[–] ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

You need glasses.

[–] CommCat@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

the girl in the brown jacket is his daughter, yeah she looks like her mom. It was a light pat on her behind, nothing sexual.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

I usually don't think this about footage from these rallies, but in this one in particular like half of the crowd looks distressed. Maybe it was from some element of social context that isn't obvious.