this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)

news

24146 readers
579 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FALGSConaut@hexbear.net 57 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fuck Eisenhower but he hit the nail on the head

Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. . . . This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.

I dunno how many schools or hospitals you could get for $800 million but I guess "this is why we don't have healthcare" memes are worth it

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s such an American thing to criticize the very thing they did for all 8 years.

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago

Of all the presidents Ike was definitely one of them

[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Feel like this is way more important than the spend.

U.S. depletes 15-20% of THAAD defending Israel from Iran.

Some back of the napkin math based on the article:

$800M at ~$15M each is ~53 interceptors. If that’s 15% of the global stockpile that means the total was around 353 and they’re down to about 300 and the article mentions Lockheed Martin can only produce 50-60/year.

It took Iran only a week to use up a years worth of interceptors. Not to mention the cost difference between the interceptors and the missiles fired at it.

This is not going to be an effective defense against any sort of prolonged engagement with a country like China or Russia.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, the math does not work here at all. The US very clearly cannot sustain any sort of war of attrition with an industrially advanced adversary at this point.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My revolutionary optimism half thinks this is great news because lol, lmao.

The doomer half thinks this is awful news because the gringos might go straight to the nuclear option when they escalate against China and they get dogwalked for a couple weeks.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 days ago

That's my biggest worry as well, we already see just how unhinged the US is. It's very possible that these psychos will start a nuclear holocaust.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 14 points 3 days ago

Hence why they pushed for that ceasefire so hard.

[–] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This also means they fired an interceptor every 10 missiles, Wich seems weird given 1/4 of the interceptions seemed to have been from this system.

Edit: I think much more likely:

They had 620 in 2021, they make 60 a year, spent 60-80 in their war against Yemen, so they had about 800, spent about one for each of the 500 Iranian missiles, I remember them using over 40 in one of the early volleys. they have less than 300 left Wich would be 40 percent left. They would have spent on average 800 millions a day on this type of interceptor, not for the whole operation. Wich makes sense given that true promise 1 cost 2 billion to intercept half of it.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah THAAD is not the only ballistic missile intercept system used. In Israel, a total of 5 systems were integrated together and used to intercept ballistic re entry vehicles directly. SM-3, Arrow 3, THAAD, Arrow 2, and David's Sling. So THAAD is just one of those 5. The actual price of a THAAD Talon interceptor is 12.7 million, which means 63 THAAD Talon interceptors were used (63*12.7=800.1). Such a number seems realistic given 39 THAAD higher altitude interceptions were caught on video visible from Jordan. That means the other 24 intercepts took place at lower altitudes, THAAD can go as low as 35-40km, and as high as 150km.

[–] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

Do they are just not firing the interceptors, but every interceptor was successful?

Yet in the much less intense aggression against Yemen, they spent more missiles?

I think they are trying to intercept with everything they got, using several arrow misiles and american ones against each Iranian ballistic one. I think it is even posible that they are left with as low 130 interceptors,

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Just ~~two and a quarter million~~ 228 million free school lunches up in smoke.

Edit: wow I cannot do math in my head and also it's much worse

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We were chatting about the black panthers the other day, anyway they went down in the anglo history books as "bad guys" (at least what I learned in school) for giving kids free lunches/breakfasts, meanwhile, while [gestures] what you mention all THIS.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

History might not be written by the child-killing monsters but the approval rating of child-killing monsters among historians is too damn high.

[–] vegeta1@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago

Thats a bar

[–] miz@hexbear.net 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 26 points 3 days ago

Healthcare please yes-honey-left

Shut your stupid ass up, can't tell me what to do! trump-drenched

Donald, turn on the money printer and firehose out a cool $800m in missiles idf-cool

Yes sir, right away sir! angry-place

[–] buh@hexbear.net 22 points 3 days ago

The virgin THAAD vs the chad $2000 drone

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Quite a few factual errors in this article.

$800 million on THAAD Talon interceptors, at $12.7 million per Talon, is 63 interceptors. That's not 15-20% of the arsenal. 900 THAAD Talons were manufactured as of February this year. 192 of these were sent to the UAE, the only foreign operator. If you assume another 100+ fired in tests and to intercept ballistic missiles from Yemen, the arsenal was around 600, so only 10-11%.

This cost estimate is an estimate, based of this article. It's an estimate that takes the 39 or so THAAD interceptors seen on video from Jordan and assumes 60% more missiles were used. Here's the source of the actual numbers counted on video from Jordan.

THAAD struggles against low-flying, hypersonic threats.

It's not meant or designed to defend against threats like that. THAAD is designed for high altitude interception in the terminal stage, hence the acronym, terminal high altitude air defence. THAAD operates between altitudes of 36-150km. THAAD is designed to be deployed in an integrated air defence network, where other systems such as Patriot PAC 3 MSE, SM-6, and in the case of Israel, Arrow-2 and David's Sling, take care of the threats at lower altitudes, and systems such as SM-3 and Arrow 3 take care of midcourse phase intercepts. THAAD contributes two things in this setup, the niche ability to plug the endo exo atmospheric gap in terminal defence, that 36-150km altitude envelope. The article actually talks about this later, so I have no idea why this is even mentioned. The other contribution is it's TPY/2 radar, significantly more powerful than the radars aboard AEGIS equipped destroyers and ashore systems that fire SM-3 and SM-6 and Israel's Green Pine radars for Arrow 3.

Future defenses need lasers, AI-driven systems.

Lasers against ballistic missiles? Unless there's a plan for space based lasers, that's not going to work. The atmosphere is too thick for a ground based laser defence against such high speed and high altitude targets. Laser defence has only just reached operational capability for slow and flying drones and potentially counter rocket, artillery and mortar systems. Long way away from laser defence against ballistic missiles.

One can talk about the strategic limits to THAAD, but who has an equivalent? Russia does not, China is the only nation attempting to operate an equivalent with the HQ-19, first publicly displayed last year. This capability is not cheap, easy to engineer, or readily available. Pakistan wants an HQ-19 battery, but we'll see if it materialises.

As for limited interceptor stocks, yes they are limited, but the US, NATO, or Israel is not going to sit around and let the opponent fire hundreds of missiles without a response. We saw this in Iran, Israel quickly mobilised their air force, surveillance and covert on the ground assets to suppress Iranian ballistic missile launch facilities. Everyone in the alt media space was talking about how Israeli jets wouldn't dare enter Iranian airspace to bomb their missile force because of Iran's air defence, yet that's exactly what happened, and Iranian air defence didn't manage to shoot down a single manned aircraft. By the end of the war, Israel was bombing as far into Iran as Yadz, 1850km from Tel Aviv. How many Iranian ballistic missiles have a range greater than 1850km? What was the state of the Iranian missile force at this point? Did the Iranian missile force manage to reduce Israel's military capabilities in any way throughout the war, or accomplish anything more than bombing population centres? This is a far more pressing concern than the state of the USA/Israeli interceptor stockpile. You can't enter an attrition war to drain the aforementioned interceptor stockpile, if your capability to fire the missiles that drain this stockpile is vastly reduced. And if all the missile force can do is credibly threaten population centres, and can't counter military capabilities, it becomes a deterrent or compllence weapon, and not a weapon that can take the fight directly to the USA/Israeli military.

[–] PostyourJaggaHogs@hexbear.net 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

love my worlds most efficient and effective military, very good at what it does. super!

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

You joke but it is the most efficient at what it does, which is make pentagon leeches very rich