this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
174 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24898 readers
2839 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While taping his Thursday show, host Stephen Colbert made the surprising announcement that CBS is ending his late night show in May.

The live audience at New York's Ed Sullivan Theater booed when he delivered the news that this would be the show's final season.

"Yeah, I share your feelings," he told the audience. "It's not just the end our our show, but it's the end of The Late Show on CBS. I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away."

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 39 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California ... "If Paramount and CBS ended The Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know," he posted on [twitter].

Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts ... also weighed in, expressing skepticism about the timing of the decision to end the show [also posted on twitter]

is there any clearer sign of what's happening than some of the most prominent left leaning members of the "opposition" party posting their concerns on a right-wing platform?

President Trump celebrated the news. "I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired," he posted on Truth Social. "I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next."

only a matter of time ....

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

President Trump celebrated the news. “I absolutely love that Colbert’ got fired,” he posted on Truth Social. “I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.”

Whether overtly coordinated or not, this was the signal for Brendan Carr to approve the Skydance merger.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I seriously wish he'd say no anyway and twist the knife.

I know they can't though, a bribe doesn't work again if others know you don't follow through... :(

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

is there any clearer sign of what’s happening than some of the most prominent left leaning members of the “opposition” party posting their concerns on a right-wing platform?

Adam Schiff is "left leaning" in the same way that Elon Musk is a socialist.

But yes, it is abundantly clear that the Ellisons are buying out Sumner Redstone and the Viacom shareholders in order to impose a more modern Silicon Valley tech sector politics on a network that's long been a thorn in the side of the Republican Party. Just like when Murdoch bought up National Geographic and the Moonies took control of the Washington Times and Bezos seized the Washington Post. Hell, just like when William Randolph Hearst bought up the San Fransisco Examiner and the New York Journal.

only a matter of time …

Back under the Bush Admin, Phil Donahue got axed for opposing the Iraq War and Dan Rather was forced out at CBS for revealing Bush's embarrassing Texas air national guard service. Or just the massive exodus of professional journalists following media consolidation during the 80s and 90s.

We've always been living in this moment. Now we're just at the point where a late night comedian is the last vestige of broadcast media still critical of a sitting President.

Just look at the list of journalists shit-canned in 2024 alone.

This wave of journalism layoffs shows no signs of receding. Since we first published this list, The Intercept, Vice, BDG, WAMU, Engadget, NowThis, and Law360 have let more than a hundred media workers go. With the help of former staff at each, we’ve managed to gather 119 new names. We also heard from many readers that we’d been too conservative in placing the start date of this wave on January 1. The pre-holiday cuts at Wired, The New Yorker, PopSugar, The Washington Post (where former employees hastened to point out that they’d taken buyouts rather than suffering layoffs), Vox, Vice (in a separate wave from this latest one), and Popular Science were too brutal to ignore. So we’ve moved the start date of this list back to November 1 — which is closer to right but is, nevertheless, somewhat arbitrary, given how often media layoff waves tend to crash.

Since we first published, we’ve added more than 250 new names to the list of 354 we had before. We’re under no illusions that this represents everyone affected by mass layoffs in media.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Dan Rather was forced out at CBS for revealing Bush’s embarrassing Texas air national guard service.

I'm no fan of Bush, but Rather used documents that turned out to be false. I don't think Rather knew that at the time, but you're omitting a hugely important piece of those events.

To quote Omar from The Wire: "If you come for the king, you best not miss".

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Rather used documents that turned out to be false.

Rather used copies of real documents that had their kerning adjusted to appear false.

you’re omitting a hugely important piece of those events.

It was a strategic ratfuck by the administration and one Karl Rove was celebrated for in the White House.

But CBS execs went along with it, because they were more concerned with next quarter's ad revenue than their broader reputation or their duty to the public as a broadcaster.

Twenty years later, the company has been fully picked apart. Their best journalists are gone and replaced with hacks. They've fully lost the youth audience and the public trust. The Ellisons are picking the last meat off the bones.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Rather used copies of real documents that had their kerning adjusted to appear false.

Can you cite a source on that? I remember back then seeing an interview with the person that made up the docs and they admitted they did it because they wanted to discredit Bush.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can you cite a source on that?

With a bunch of time spent digging around in old Internet archives maybe.

they admitted they did it because they wanted to discredit Bush.

He sounds trustworthy so I guess we'll take that at face value

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

they admitted they did it because they wanted to discredit Bush.

He sounds trustworthy so I guess we’ll take that at face value

Detective #1: "We have the murderer. He admitted to killing the victim."

Detective #2: "What kind of fool are you to believed that?!"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

According to the National Registry of Exonerations in the United States, 27% of those on the registry who were accused of homicide, but were later exonerated, gave false confessions. However, 81% of people with mental illness or intellectual disabilities also confessed when accused of homicide.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

Your own source cited numbers even suggest the majority of people admitting to murder are the one that did the murder, and you're trying to use that as a defense to your point?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

schiff is as far left as the majority of this country is willing to go (despite clearly needing actual leftism) and i don't doubt that this shift has been a decades long effort; my point was to make another splash in the (ignored) bucket of warnings to my fellow americans since it's really hard to ignore tv in this culture.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

schiff is as far left as the majority of this country is willing to go

He's not even the most left leaning in his city. LA has four different DSA city councilors

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Bending the knee to a felon rapist is so 2025.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

So a show that has consistently high ratings and viewership, was just nominated for an Emmy and already won numerous Peabody awards is getting the ax.

Cutting off their nose to spite their face.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

For those looking to boycott, just stop watching TV. They (Paramount) own so much shit. As an 80s kid it seems so wrong the same company owns VH1 and MTV (nevermind neither channel is what it used to be).

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Haven't had cable in 20 years and have never paid for a streaming service.

Life finds a way.

[–] TheCleric@lemmy.org 4 points 5 days ago

Torrent shit

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Bending the fucking knee

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago

What shows will Trump come for next?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Doing what Trump wanted basically.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

First of many more to come…