this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
234 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

3305 readers
142 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
fxomt@piefed.social
234
Medicaid is giving ICE access to data of 79M enrollees, including ethnicity (therealnews.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It’s unthinkable that CMS would violate the trust of Medicaid enrollees in this way

Once again stolen medical records are being used for state oppression. In WWII, the Netherlands suffered 75% of their Jewish population killed - the highest of any country even Germany - because the invading Nazis made a beeline for the medical records archive where the government kept a meticulous track of all Dutch citizens. I never volunteer race or ethnicity on any such forms - there is no medical benefit, it can only come back to hurt you.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Close, but it wasn't medical records but Population registration, a sort of census on steroids which kept meticulous details on every citizen in The Netherlands.

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

Oh right, the Nazis will come for the 2020 Census data next.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

there is no medical benefit, it can only come back to hurt you.

This is the modern day mantra of data. If it isn't fundamentally required, then don't give it. There's no "just 'cause" when it comes to collecting info. And once info is given, you have zero control over it, no matter how many pinky promises or guarantees of governance are given, it's immediately out of your control.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

...when people become a numbered commodity...

[–] archiduc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s why France doesn’t have an ethnicity database and why t’s illegal to ask for it.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

This is so obvious too

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (6 children)

As not yankee, why is ethnicity even stored in that database??

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Race is somewhat relevant to medical care. I forget why?

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It can be helpful to be able to track medical trends within an ethnic group, or to focus on certain diseases that only affect a specific group (e.g. sickle cell in the Black community). Unfortunately, that same data in the wrong hands becomes a problem.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Fwiw, Asians are lactose intolerant. Scandinavians are more prone to diabetes and cystic fibrosis.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Straight answer:

Shitlibs had to add means testing to all social programs and had to collect data saying xyz group was underserved and also had a data fetish.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to the blood donor ppl, it helps to give ppl similar blood. I dk how much bs that is. That's just what they told me.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It is BS. Blood typing exists.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Straight answer:

Shitlibs had to add means testing to all social programs and had to collect data saying xyz group was underserved and also had a data fetish.

No of course this coukd never be abused; we made a law saying not to!

[–] kalapala@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Are the same people saying they have nothing to hide?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Missing the real question that we all know the answer to: why are they asking?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They will be looking for POCs specifically

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Hey. Thats not necessarily true!

Could be using a white list.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 1 week ago

Oh boy...

[–] notsure@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...the weak are very accessible...

[–] notsure@fedia.io 0 points 1 week ago

...you downvoters don't think the weak are accessible?..

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Holyfakamoly!