this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
104 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

3661 readers
167 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.

Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.

Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
BrikoX@lemmy.zip
104
Sam Altman warns there's no legal confidentiality when using ChatGPT as a therapist (techcrunch.com)
submitted 4 days ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In response to a question about how AI works with today's legal system, Altman said one of the problems of not yet having a legal or policy framework for AI is that there's no legal confidentiality for users' conversations.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danhab99@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

I'm trying to make Ollama more accessible so I can replace Chatgpt.

  • I installed open-webui but I don't wanna deal with tls certs so now I gotta figure out a way to use ssh tunnels (I hate Wireguard)
  • I gotta figure out how Ollama can keep a model alive to answer me asap while not interrupting videogames
  • I want to build tools for open-webui so I can integrate my local AI with Google calendar and Jira, right now it's my open-api-toolkit project but it's not ready for me yet.

I realized how much info I've been pushing to Chatgpt and it feels like 10000x more that what I've exposed to Google or Instagram. I share with Chatgpt all my wildest secret project ideas and I don't want Chatgpt to have that anymore. I hope deleting my account will actually delete my chats but I know for a fact that that's a dream.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

Bet you million bucks though, he still wants you to keep using it for your therapy. He wants you to feed as much data as possible about yourself. That data is worth billions.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The saddest thought I can think of is telling your emotional problems to a high speed calculator

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago

I know, I really don’t understand why people would take advice from a mechanical parrot. You’re better off throwing chicken bones or interpreting the flight patterns of crows.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's no confidentiality nor accountability for the generated words.

It's a fucking toaster. You put words in, press a button you get toast out.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That's pointing us into one conclusion, people don't like silence.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago

AI training can steal whatever copyrighted property it wants. AI is not subject to any laws. It’s AI, fuck you, use it.

[–] forrgott 1 points 2 days ago

I've been starting to wonder just how much this shit "phones home". Because, obviously, this technology can be used to increase the capabilities of corporate surveillance.