It's a hostile act against pedophiles. If they happen to be in the pedophile files, then that's their fault.
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
799 points (99.4% liked)
Bluesky
1920 readers
1 users here now
People skeeting stuff.
Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Gee, why is this a hostile act against them specifically? I mean, unless someone in the GOP were actually listed in the Epstein Files. Right?
"Fuck! Fuck! Quick, have somebody shoot a right-wing media personality, I'll get the victimization copy ready!"
"Imgur is over capacity" error 😆
That's the standard , "we can't track you on a VPN" error as well fwiw.
That is good to know, thats probably exactly the problem.
Breaking senate norms
Fuck all those norms. The republicans never bother to follow them and yet the dems think there’s something to preserve by still abiding by “norms”
Hey, that supreme court pick of yours is actually mine. Also, why aren't you following the rules?
GOP and pedophiles - the venn diagram is a circle.
Why is it that every time I see a BTC screenshot on social media, it's always of him cheering on his other account's post? His replies never add any new information, and yet they always seem to be included; it's never just the original post on its own.
Is it his PR team spreading these screenshots?
I think in this case one is twitter (I refuse to say x) and the other is blue sky and op pulled it from blue sky because twitter is... Obvious reasons.
that doesn't address the question of why the guy(in the image) is posting his own tweet in third person?
In third person? He's just sharing information between two different websites.
I've noticed his titles are almost already click bait. "MTG just got embarrassed by her own words." Ummm, no she didn't.
More of this.
Copy and pasting the same thing to two sites is just yuck. This way it's fresh.
Having an age of consent is a hostile act against the GOP too, perhaps?
They don't care about consent. If anything it's a turn off for them. They crave the power imbalance.
Really? After the way the current administration has been skirting the "checks and balances" this is "breaking senate procedural norms"? lmao
Still won't happen....
Release the Trump/Epstein files
It’s good that Schumer is doing it. But frankly, this is far too little, far too late. Fucker needs to be primaried.
Oh no. Anyway...
I knew a guy that said he was over the epstein files.
Eh it's just old men and little girls, right guys? Guys?
Snowflakes
Telling on themselves.
It is not hostile.
Shouldnt be so worried if your not doing anything wrong.
Oh no. The bad boys release the inconsequential files that confirmed what everyone already knew. Pathetic excuse to look like they aren't accomplices of the king.
Can't wait for facism to fall any day now, guys. Everyone said the files would do it. Lmao.