this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
95 points (100.0% liked)

Twitter

650 readers
1 users here now

An unofficial Twitter Community: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On this moment you'll need an account to view anything on the platform..

Every day the bird dies a little more

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bot@seal.cafe 78 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That’s not what paywalled means.

[–] stux@geddit.social 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And that's why the "quotes" 😉

[–] pieselpriemel@mastodon.online 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Beautiful plumage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Melpomene@kbin.social 19 points 2 years ago

The good ol' loginwall that social media sites have been moving to for a few years. Meta is also guilty of this... making it almost impossible to check out anything without a login.

[–] ch1cken@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Just a reminder that nitter exists, which lets you browse twitter without needing an account, from a minimal ui and having everything proxied through the instance of choice for privacy. You can use the libredirect firefox addon to automatically redirect twitter (& optionally other services like youtube/reddit, etc to its frontend like nitter).

You can view a list of instances here.

edit: ... wow it looks like nitter's also affected by the account requirement, it stopped working, rip..

[–] Xeelee@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

Shit filtered through a fine cloth is still shit.

[–] tal@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Works now, though I don't know what nitter.net's method of obtaining Tweet data is, and wouldn't be terribly surprised if Twitter intends to crack down on that, sooner or later.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LostCause@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Good, I don‘t want to see it anyway and the less people use it the better for the world.

[–] aroom@tooting.ch 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@stux good. now we can really pressure public services to move from it.

[–] stux@geddit.social 3 points 2 years ago

Kinda funny that sooo many links on soo many websites just redirect now

Hopefully most will now see Twitter is a sinking ship

[–] Jerry@hear-me.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@stux
@MissingThePt
I'm now expecting Elon Jr. (Spaz) to do the same on Reddit because Elon is his idol and mentor.

I wish there was an option on #DuckDuckGo to exclude search results that point to Twitter since I can no longer read them. It's now just clutter in the search results.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] disposabletentacle@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's frustrating, but I'm betting it won't last. With all the people who only visit twitter via links from other sites (or those embedded tweets in news articles), doing something like this will cause twitter's page traffic to suddenly implode. Which will cause their advertisement impression statistics to implode. Which will make their paying advertisers explode. And then twitter will roll it back.

Unless, of course, Elongated Muskrat is intentionally and purposefully trying to completely remove twitter from existence. In which case, this is a pretty clever move.

[–] tal@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

trying to completely remove twitter from existence

I expect that Twitter just wants people to install the Twitter app and get Twitter accounts.

I suppose that Reddit could do the same thing as well.

[–] ackzsel@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and nothing of value was lost. . .

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you're still on Twitter, you're part of the problem.

[–] exscape@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

If you browse Twitter without an account you're probably not part of the problem.
A friend ran in to this today when trying to check if a service provider was having technical issues.

[–] xc2215x@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It isn't a paywall if you can make a free account to access it.

[–] alex@geddit.social 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

"loginwalled" then. We know what he means.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Oh no!

Anyway...

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Oh lovely, another loginwall...

You only have to login, but what if I don't want an account with you just to read what someone's put on there?

[–] TritTriton@shelter.moe 5 points 2 years ago

@stux As I said on Mastodon: it probably is another “bug” that plagues Twitter since… “this guy” put his hands on it. It could be fixed soon because of the ruckus it will certainly make.

For now, you can still use Nitter instead.

[–] jasonnab@hachyderm.io 4 points 2 years ago
[–] vtez44@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

It actually started to work for me without account when Elon bought it. Maybe it's geographical, you're not only person who says that.

load more comments
view more: next ›