this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
359 points (97.4% liked)

World News

51464 readers
2993 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The worst-case scenario is now a possible one: European troops fighting off an invasion largely alone.

It’s by no means clear the Europeans would succeed. Romanian and other European officials at the exercise in Cincu, about 260 kilometers (162 miles) north of Bucharest by road, voiced concerns about how long it would take for NATO allies to make it to the front.

French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side. “The direction of history is a progressive disengagement of the United States from the European continent,” he said.

archive

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archer@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

10 comments and the pro Russia bots are already here

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Such is life currently: hyperbolic questions in ironic comments like " have you proof about Ruzz agression, because the West..." etc.

Smh, about the contrast between their potential to embrace a grand selfdeception and the arrogant stubbornness to look away from the invasive destruction and killings Shahed drones cause on a daily bases for more than a thousand days.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Some of those kinds of comments are typically from terminally online Marxist-Leninists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

NATO/EU needs to start moving resources more into place. This will cause putin to have to move troops out of Ukraine to balance.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even along the Ukrainian border, the Russian troops guarding the frontier are their least capable units full of troops typically serving their 1 year conscription. Putin knows that NATO lacks the capacity for a Sneak Attack. Unless Poland orders full mobilization, the Russians won't move more than token forces to the border.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

NATO won't attack, but putin is paranoid. I doubt he'd be able to ignore a buildup of NATO troops on his doorstep. And NATO needs to deploy hordes of drones and drone defenses as practice anyway.

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 35 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Let the comments here be a friendly reminder to people that they should block and boycott the .ml instance

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

I love how it occurs so naturally that by the time I come into a post that talks about Russia and Ukraine, half the posts are already limited and I can't expand threads because people replying are ones I've already blocked in other posts for being absolutely developmentally challenged.

[–] Xartle@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I missed the drama. This was the first Lemmy account I made. Is this server overrun with bots now?

[–] devdoggy@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

So the .ml stands for Marxist Lenin... Just to get you started.

[–] Maldreamer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not really, .ml stands for Mali domain. And just because someone believes in Marxist principle or communism isn't a issue. Personally for me why I am wary of .ml domain is because often I do see people posting obvious Chinese and North Korean propoganda with shady source and wild claims and their refusal to accept criticism of China or other communist past and present regimes. Also they get really defensive and assume you are pro west or pro imperialism when you happen to criticize china for something and then their whole argument would be bashing the west when both are to fault.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The devs for Lemmy are Marxists and they setup lemmy.ml as the first lemmy instance. They chose .ml because for them it stands for Marxist-Leninist, despite what ICANN officially regards it as.

Also, like you point out, the instance pushes a lot of bizarre propaganda and dissent is often met with bans. From my observations, criticism of Russia or China can get you banned, presumably because these countries have a history of communism. Also, they even defend Putin and justify the invasion of Ukraine.

In my view, it’s one thing to be communist. It’s another to align yourself with the worst examples of it. Many communists distance themselves from the CCP and USSR, arguing that these were not real examples of communism. But, these folks in .ml seem to be defenders of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I love you got three angy downvotes for explaining this.

I'm sad there isn't an appropriate gif of an "angry tankie" shaking his fist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile USA is fully prepared to comfort Russia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That is for the best. The US is a hostile power, and allowing it to embed enemy troops or sabotage NATO operations should not be permitted. Europe is better off without the traitorous Trump Regime.

It sucks that it has to be this way, but to deny the intent and nature of the current United States, is to invite disaster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 weeks ago (26 children)

Thankfully Russia can't afford to stretch themselves much more. I implore them to try something it shouldn't take much to fuck them at this point.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It’s by no means clear the Europeans would succeed. Romanian and other European officials at the exercise in Cincu, about 260 kilometers (162 miles) north of Bucharest by road, voiced concerns about how long it would take for NATO allies to make it to the front.

Those two things are not synonymous.

Romanian military are concerned it would take allies time to get to the front (I.e. it would take time for NATO to mobilise in the event of an unanticipated invasion of Romania). However firstly that doesn't mean victory wouldn't be ultimately achieved (allied forces had a bad time of it during the first part of the second world war, but ultimately were victorious) and secondly it assumes that Russia would be able to rally its forces (what forces) and initiate a surprise invasion despite Europe heavily monitoring Russian military activity. Which all seems unlikely.

I'm also unclear about why 260 km is considered an insurmountable distance. In an emergency that distance could be covered in a couple of hours, (I'm assuming that liberation forces and not required to obey the speed limit) presumably everyone would be going the other way in any case.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

French four-star General Philippe de Montenon said he’s confident Europe could prevail, even without the US on side.

This is discussed too rarely. Does anybody know of a source that makes a reliable comparison?

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Only the former head of the US forces in NATO, Ben Hodges , has oftentimes said similar lines afaik, like here :

Europe should “quit whining” about the threats it faces and “act like the superpower” that it is, according to a former senior US army officer.

Generally, he's quite confident about Europe defending itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

Well, France has the second or third largest/most powerful individual Navy in the world, and Russia has severely diminished trained personnel, so unless China enters it would be a one sided massacre in Europe's favor.

Probably why Russia has worked so hard on the south of Ukraine to secure the sea border even losing territory in the north.

The issue is when China enters, and whose side they will be on. Does Xi Jinpooh see more profit in helping his cabal of friendly dictators or would he just carve out a slice of the Russia Pie?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

it would really be something else if they fought them off successfully and the united states looked like pussies and assholes

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 9 points 3 weeks ago

They already do. US is currently the only country pushing for surrender (note, it's not just Ukraine, peace plan forces stuff from US too, including industry help and money) while negotiating with terrorists. It will take a very long time for me to see US in the same light I used to. Imagine US surrendering to ISIS. Beyond humiliating.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

How much can one bullet cost?

load more comments
view more: next ›