Maybe this is just me, but I think decreasing the amount of government money being paid to landlords going down by more than 10% in a single budget is a good thing.
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)
UK Politics
4506 readers
119 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This includes the £3.5m the government pays each day to billionaire landlord Graham King, the 154th wealthiest person in the UK, to provide migrant and refugee accommodation via his housing outfit, Clearsprings. This contract alone would eat up the mansion tax receipts in less than a fortnight.
Put another way, the government is paying for services it uses. But Novara Media thinks the government should use services and not pay anything?
The government can make compulsory purchases of land and buildings. Pay him off once, then sell the properties once they're no longer needed would be a sensible thing to do.