this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
47 points (98.0% liked)

Hardware

6409 readers
95 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They should just make it DisplayPort only and provide a DP to HDMI 2.1 dongle with it.

[–] JohnWorks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I’m glad they provide the option for both ports but I worry it might be confusing for consumers and a dongle might have been a better call here. They probably should’ve done what Nvidia has done and have the firmware for HDMI on the video chip rather than on the OS.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

There are still handshake issues with that.

There IS a workaround consumers can do. It involves flashing a REALLY sketchy firmware to one of the mainstream dongles. And it still isn't true HDMI 2.1. It just gets you VRR and enough HDR that I don't know the difference.

But probably not something a company like Valve wants to actively sell. Expect hundreds of variants on aliexpress but your country may vary as to whether that is cost effective to purchase.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. 2x DisplayPorts would allow for 2 monitors to be connected.
It would have been much better.

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lots of DisplayPort monitors can support daisy chaining, so you don't even need 2 ports on the system.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev -1 points 2 months ago

Well, I have only seen the cheaper ones that don't and won't that also require the DP cable to actually be a good one, instead of whatever I found around? I actually tried quite a bit to find a DP cable that I could know, would have a better data-rate, but all I found was people reselling the complementary cables that came in device packages, for a few extra bucks. Only HDMI being available with properly rated packages.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The HDMI Forum is pretty evil. Reminds me of the MPEG licensing groups.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

All my homies hate HDMI

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It's just more bs hdmi drama. Can we get DP please?