108
submitted 1 year ago by xuxebiko@kbin.social to c/world@lemmy.world

Hindu vigilantes have long tried to stop the cow trade, often carried out by Muslims, but have become more extreme and flamboyant thanks to American social media platforms that reward them with large online followings.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xuxebiko@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Representatives from YouTube and Meta also told her they worried that removing hateful influencers would physically endanger the firms’ employees in India.

And yet these ultra-powerful mega-wealthy organizations did not raise the issue with the US gov or the Indian govt to ensure safety of their employees for adhering to corporate standards nor did they shut shop in India till the Modi govt guaranteed the safety of their staff. these SMs know modi needs them to spread his hate-filled agenda.

X/ twitter is partly owned by Islamic UAE, yet they let Hindu supremacists say the vilest Islamophobic comments, post vile acts of violence against Muslims. So much for Islamic ummah.

To this day, trying to get an Islamophobic a/c down on any of the SMs mentiond is an act of patience and oftentimes futility.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

YouTube knows Modi would love to make hay out of them censoring Hindus. They're like the evangelicals in that way. Always oppressed.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And yet these ultra-powerful mega-wealthy organizations did not raise the issue with the US gov or the Indian govt to ensure safety of their employees

Unless you're an insider, how could you possibly know this?

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 year ago

There isn't a better example of clown world than this.

We gotta get rid of this whole religion thing, it's making people do insane things.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is fascism. It uses religion as a convenient part of their "culturally pure" state ideology. It's a more basic sociological ingroup/outgroup reaction than anything to do with religion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindutva

The definition and the use of Hindutva and its relationship with Hinduism has been a part of several court cases in India. In 1966, the Chief Justice Gajendragadkar wrote for the Supreme Court of India in Yagnapurushdasji (AIR 1966 SC 1127), that "Hinduism is impossible to define".[30][b] The court adopted Radhakrishnan's submission that Hinduism is complex and "the theist and atheist, the sceptic and agnostic, may all be Hindus if they accept the Hindu system of culture and life".

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

I just tried to get a definition for fascism but apparently that's quite difficult to define also. It's easy enough to get a feel for what the word 'fascism' is trying to describe though.

So next question is, are there some religions that are more sympathetic to, or more likely to bring about fascism?

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Gee, isn’t it great that Google is moving all their podcasts, music, tv, and movies to the flea market that is YouTube?

[-] xuxebiko@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago
[-] bobman@unilem.org 5 points 1 year ago

Let me guess, they're going to tell me about the footage without showing me the footage.

Modern journalists suck.

[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There's literally footage in the article lol

[-] bobman@unilem.org -2 points 1 year ago

Really? Where's the footage of him getting shot?

[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The article is titled "He live streamed his attacks on Indian-Muslims..", you asked if there was footage, there is footage in the article.

You didn't say anything about specific footage of him being shot so we're just moving the goalposts now so you don't have say you didn't actually look before you posted.

[-] bobman@unilem.org -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What are you talking about? I'm not looking for a cut with news anchors talking over it.

I'm looking for the original footage. There is no moving of the goalposts, lol.

"He live streamed his attacks." Yes, I am looking for the recorded live stream.

Not sure why this needs to be spelled out for you, but I have a feeling you have difficulty admitting when you're wrong and always feel like you have the right answer.

Sorry bud, this time you didn't. Goodbye. Gonna block you now cause you don't seem like you have anything important to say.

[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Charmin soft, my guy.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
108 points (96.6% liked)

World News

38965 readers
2223 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS