this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
11 points (92.3% liked)

Asklemmy

51765 readers
682 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm astounded that some people have lived such prolific noteworthy lives, were world-famous for decades, contributed so much, made life-changing inventions that the whole world benefitted from ...

Yet the only words on their headstone are like "Dad, Brother, Son, We love you."

Like WHAT?? He invented the xyz and had the leading role in 300 Hollywood films & 20 Guinness world records & discovered the cure for xyz and on & on ...

Why not mention any of that on their headstone?

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It can have any length. It's the family who chooses the words that they think it fits the most with the deceased.

Example 1. Example 2. Example 3.

Very short epitaphs are kinda sad.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You either knew the person, then you don't need that information. Or you didn't know that person, then it's none of your business.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do we really need the dead bragging about their achievements the same as the living?

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Epitaphs are written by those who loved & survived the decedent. So if they could financially afford the cost of some extra words engraved in stone, it would be a nice way to honor the person they loved.

[–] ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm much more impressed by someone being good to their loved ones than someone being rich or famous.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes that's perfectly fine and nice and beautiful, but don't you think it's weird seeing celebrity gravestones that make no mention of the fact that they were famous and what they were known for?

Honestly my YouTube algorithm keeps giving me videos from "Scott On Tape" and "Dearly Departed Tours" who cover a lot of celebrity lore and graveyards, and that's why this is so prominent in my mind, there are a lot of famous people with very minimal headstones and I find it odd.

And then there's Frank Zappa who requested to be buried but no headstone whatsoever, not even his family is sure exactly where he is, they know the general area in the graveyard but it's unmarked. And that's how Frank Zappa wanted it πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™€οΈ

[–] ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

You're thinking about what these people mean to you, not what they mean to the people who buried them. When you're close to someone famous, they're not that impressive guy with hundreds of achievements, they're just dad, brother, son, beloved. I wouldn't want to be dehumanized by someone turning my headstone into a CV.

As for Zappa, he was a weird guy. You can tell by listening to any of his albums. Plenty of reason to love his music.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Funerals are for the living, not the dead. Grieving family members care about the person as a dad, brother or son, not as the hollywood record breaking super scientist.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

Because the purpose is not to be a biography or obituary. The purpose is to say something brief and poignant/emotional. People write actual obituaries/eulogies/biographies for that purpose.

[–] lemuria@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago

Last I checked it costs too much to engrave wikipedia articles into headstones.

[–] VeganBtw@piefed.social 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I love the implication that they found a cure for their own invention

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I know, I know it was poorly written but I was just rattling off various examples of achievements that various people have achieved.

The headstone is not there for you. The cemetery is there for you, though.

[–] Blurntout@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Ah death the great humbler, but really headstones imo are more for the people close to you left behind than testament of a life well livedπŸ˜…

Personally burn me and spread some ashes somewhere that makes you - people left behind happy remembering me

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because stonemasons charge by the letter.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Ok but what about famous wealthy celebrities for whom money is no concern?

What do stonemasons charge? $100k per letter?

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I'll probably use a QR code

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And then years later someone will be posting "Why do all these gravestones link to sketchy scam websites?"

You can encode quite a bit of text in a QR code... It doesn't need to be a URL. Smart idea!

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I like this idea a lot! Because walking through graveyards we get curious and we want to know about these people. Especially celebrities, and we would be fascinated to know the cause of death too because of course that's never written on the epitaph either. I wish cause of death would be written on epitaphs. I know that would be dark & morbid & in poor taste but honestly that's what everybody's interested to know!