The only way to have a single foreign policy is through federalisation!
YUROP
Welcome to YUROP
The Ultimate Eurozone of Culture, Chaos, and Continental Excellence
A glorious gathering place to celebrate (and lovingly roast) the lands, peoples, quirks, and contradictions of Her Most Magnificent Europa. From the fjords to the Med, the steppes to the Atlantic spray, this is a shrine to everything that makes Europe gloriously weird, wonderfully diverse, and occasionally passive-aggressive in 24 languages.
Here we toast:
πͺπΊ The progressive Union of Peace (and paperwork)
π§ The freest of health care
π· The finest of foods
π³οΈβπ The liberalest of liberties
π The proud non-members and honorary cousins
πΆ And the eternal dance of unity, confusion, and cultural banter.
Post memes, news, satire, linguistic wars, train maps, cursed food photos, Eurovision fever, propaganda and whatever makes you scream βonly in YUROP.β
Leave your stereotypes at the border control and enjoy the ride.
The EU's choice is more like "bow to a monster" or "become a monster." Big powers act like big powers. If Europe as a whole becomes like the US, then it will start acting internationally in many of the same ways as the US.
Why? Itβs not written in stone.
Because humans are humans and nations act the way they do because of the environment they exist in. When you become a single massive federated nation, you have very different incentives acting on you than when you're a smaller country.
Or are you acting out of some sense of European exceptionalism? If so, you're already well on the way to acting like the United States!
Why should it? EU has a large economy and a lot of people. If it managed to unite, at least when facing a threat, it could easilybe a major global power.
The conservative credo "the past defines the possible" or "nothing new is ever conceivable"
A new power learning the lessons from the past? Can't have that!
then it will start acting internationally in many of the same ways as the US.
Have you heard of colonization?
The US, China, and the USSR (cant think of Russain Federation examples...) all have cases in which their involvement of influence were positive things.
It is the duty of the priviledged and powerful to empower the unpriviledged.
I would be walking somewhere in the grass because I want neither.
Is that Neuschwanstein or the Disney Castle behind the EU flag?
Satisfying SΓΆder noises
Enslaving.
How do all those countries using CFAs with half of their national currency reserves being held hostage in Paris feel about this?
Not that the situation isn't far better than American, Chinese, or Russians vassalization, but let's not prentend the EU doesn't engage in rampant neocolonialosm, the knowing exploitation of vast amounts of illegal migrant labor via human trafficking, human rights violations to "protect" Fortress Europa, etc etc.
Voters: βI like purpleβ
With that start, can we be sure that the left path doesn't also lead to the right castle?
However, after US President John F. Kennedy expressed his displeasure about this to the West German ambassador to the United States, the Bundestag ratified the treaty with a preamble which called on France and West Germany to pursue tight cooperation with the United States; the eventual admission of the United Kingdom to the EEC; the achievement of a free trade accord in the framework of the GATT; and for the West's military integration in NATO under US leadership
