this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
831 points (99.3% liked)

memes

19830 readers
508 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 159 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

OpenAI 2015 - non-profit.

OpenAI 2025 - no profit.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 67 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

OpenAI 2027 - Dead.

That's my hope atleast.

[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At this rate its us or them

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Don't be so pessimistic, it's quite possible it'll be them and us if they take the world economy down with them.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

More like 0 BILLION profit

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How many of those we could build with $1.5 trillion...

[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

Enough for each to be crafter by luxuary designer personally for each billionaire.

Or just build a single cheapest one and reuse for each billionaire, giving away $1.5 trillion to the normal people.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

More than we would need for single use on billionaires.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Building a company on the assumption some technological miracle will fall into your lap might not be the best business plan. Ignoring reality is pretty common in those circles too. Or maybe that's just living in a different reality from say the bottom 99% of the wealth curve.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I wish reality agreed with you.

Tell it to the richest man in the world.

Full self driving 2030 guys I swear.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Thats our plan for climate change right now so...

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

“We made ten digit profits! Zero is a digit.”

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm going to start saying I'm on a 7-figure salary.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

In Zimbabwe Dollars, I am a trillionaire.

[–] PastelKeystone@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wish business “journalists” would stop calling these 10 year old companies “startups”.

It’s like calling that 10-12 year old kid who was still breastfeeding on Game of Thrones “my baby”.

They did this with Uber, AirBnb, & Spotify as well.

[–] tallricefarmer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

I think "startup" is an industry term that means something on their relationship with investors. The next step is "unicorn" and in that stage i think a board is formed that can influence the company.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They built a solution in search of a problem, which isn't uncommon.

But, the AI can't solve anything without climbing over the guardrails and hallucinating. Turns out the only thing it's good for is art, music, and writing, but only if you accept that it's not very good at any of those, either.

I think the LLM method is a dead end. I think they've all figured that out, and now they're panicking because they've gone neck-deep into debt to fund this virtually useless tech. I hope the entire thing goes tits up this year, and used GPUs flood the market.

[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago

On my opinion, there is absolutely nothing wrong with ai as a thechology. The problem comes from corporations trying to sell it as a solution for non-existent problem, also not caring about that most people dont need it.

[–] eta@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the capabilities are alright, it's just way too expensive to run and now they are struggling to pay for that cost.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Exactly. The capabilities are nice. The issues come up when we talk price. The capabilities are not $99/month nice. And they're not "Mark Zuckerberg knows everything I search for" nice, either.

So we wait and watch the bubble wobble, while I put pennies in my GPU savings jar.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 weeks ago

Breaking even would be a huge improvement for them. They can only dream of zeros.

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Don’t encourage them. Making a profit would mean ads on ChatGPT.

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Before I answer your question, have you heard about today's sponsor, Raid Shadow Legends?"

[–] atcorebcor@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Or when people ask about products and options for services, that certain services can pay to be more likely to be mentioned defeating the whole purpose of actual comparison.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 11 points 1 week ago

Good, I don't want chatgpt to be a good product. I want the experience to suck so the world can stop pretending it's useful

[–] ogeist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

"Sure, that mysterious downstairs rash will probably clear up. But why wait on biology when you could unleash the all-new Ford™ F-150 with a face-melting 720 HORSEPOWER? It doesn't just drive-it obliterates problems, rashes included."

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I earn five digits per day: £100.00 😎

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Usually I don't judge an organization by their profits, since it isn't very indicative of its products' and/or services' value.

But yeah, in this case it makes sense and is absolutely hilarious.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

And how much does this ass gets paid again?

[–] babyfarmer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pete Davidson is gonna play him in the shitty movie, isn't he?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Nah, probably Jared Leto.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I hope it all fucking fails.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They will get the revenue when scalping all their GPUs and nVidiaPUs... and RAM and PSUs ...

[–] db2@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People were making the same jokes about Spotify and Uber for 10 years, good to see nobody learned

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No they weren't. At all. The jokes about spotify et. al. were about paying rent for something you used to own, not that the idea was completely useless and unprofitable.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lol are you trying to gaslight me?

that doesn’t even make sense about uber, paying for what that you used to own?

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do you fail to understand that that specific point applies to Spotify?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

because you said

The jokes about spotify et. al.

What do you think et. al. means?

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"and others". Why do you think that must project to where it doesn't make sense? Almost like you're too dumb to understand implication and context...

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We are discussing my own experiences over the last 10 years with people saying uber et. al. are unprofitable and will therefore eventually go broke, the OP looks to be repeating this

If you are unable to understand what we’re talking about and use words you don’t understand maybe spend less time being a snarky fuck and more time thinking about what you type

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

lol your projection of stupidity won't be doing you any favors.