It takes twice as much electrical energy to produce energy in the form of gasoline.
We lose money on every sale, but make it up on volume!
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
62 points (97.0% liked)
Technology
79233 readers
1738 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Finally a way to turn clean solar into something I can burn.
Sell these to the "but mah vroom vroom noise" crowd and switch everything to electric.
It’s not worse. It’s carbon neutral (as long as the energy source is renewable like the sun). Any carbon it takes in will be released exactly back to where it was. It’s a much much better option than digging up oil.
On top of that, there are currently no likely possibilities of replacing gasoline for things like planes. So replacing their gas with carbon neutral gas will improve the situation by 100%.
Any carbon it takes in will be released exactly back to where it was.
Except it won't be. Combustion is not a perfect CxHy O2 > CO2 + H2O reaction. Theres a bunch of other side reactions happening, NOx, unburned hydrocarbons, particulate matter, carbon monoxide. There are lots of challenges to continuing to utilize hydrocarbon fuels, especially in mobile/small scale applications where you can't clean the exhaust stream.
Battery electric aeroplanes aren't as far off as you might think, but you're technically correct that they don't currently exist.
For planes there's a catalytic process that can turn ethanol into jet fuel.
Aircela is targeting >50% end to end power efficiency. Since there is about 37kWh of energy in a gallon of gasoline we will require about 75kWh to make it. When we power our machines with standalone, off-grid, photovoltaic panels this will correspond to less than $1.50/gallon in energy cost.
Meanwhile, an electric vehicle could go hundreds of miles on the same amount of energy input...
Gasoline is a very high energy material. You can put it into anything (that works with gas) in seconds and store it for months.
Is this a perfect solution? No. But it’s technically possible to achieve carbon neutrality on an ICE vehicle with zero modification, you’ve just got ~50% loss on the solar you collected.
Another device of the type that Thunderf00t used to 'bust.'
The "Why 'Feminism' is poisoning atheism", "Feminism Vs FACTS" chud?
I'm surprised he still has an audience tbh. Well, sadly not that surprised.
Thunderf00t
Love his YT channel... he destroys Elon reputation (if he ever had one...) and calls his 90% BS . lol
So power to x, basically
But smaller
Reusing the co2 in the air. Its a good idea.
No it's not a good idea.
It's extremely inefficent compared to just using elecricity directly for whatever you're planning to do with it.
All the catches