this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
157 points (100.0% liked)

World News

52630 readers
4099 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

Since the start of the war in Ukraine in February 2022, the Russian energy sector has been broadly targeted by 19 rounds of European sanctions. Coal, oil and gas have all been affected. However, the nuclear industry has been completely spared and remains the exception.

In Brussels, discussions about potential sanctions, initially planned for June 2025, were postponed. At a time when France is described as one of the main countries opposing a full ban on Russian nuclear deliveries, a report published on Wednesday, January 28, by the anti-nuclear NGO Greenpeace once again underscored that the trading of uranium, the fuel for nuclear power plants, continues between Paris and Moscow, shrouded in opacity.

The links between France and Russia on this issue have been extensively documented in recent years. Ships from Saint Petersburg or Ust-Luga, on the Russian Baltic coast, regularly continue to dock at the Port of Dunkerque, northern France, carrying containers filled with uranium in various forms. While France does not import natural uranium mined in Russia itself, the latest customs data analyzed by Greenpeace showed that between 2022 and September 2025, nearly half of these raw material imports came from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, two former Soviet republics.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MooseWinooski@lemmy.ca 17 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Canada has the 3rd largest uranium reserves on the planet and ranks second in production. Canadians even contributed scientists and supplied uranium for the Manhattan project. We also go hard on supporting Ukraine as the top per-capita contributor to Ukraine aid.

There's your new seller.

[–] Sirius006@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago

From the article :

"Greenpeace noted that, as of early 2026, the Russian giant Rosatom "remains the main foreign player in mining in Kazakhstan" through its Canadian subsidiary Uranium One."

So yes, but actually no.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 21 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It should also be noted that Russia and Wagner played a large role in the country of Niger cutting ties with France. Niger's uranium mines were a colonial fuel source for many of France's reactors.

As much as I don't love colonialism, this is just colonialism with extra steps.

[–] Lor@mander.xyz 8 points 18 hours ago

Hmmm not cool

[–] vpol@feddit.uk 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why not buy it from Kazakhstan directly?

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Probably because Kazakhstan is a land locked country (the Caspian Sea doesn't really count). So the options are to transport through either russia, iran or china. Through china is a much longer route, so it will be more expensive, and I'm not sure china would want to get uranium to France. Iran is not an option because of international sanctions that have been in place for a lot longer than the ones against Russia. And through Russia is by far the shortest route.

[–] vpol@feddit.uk 6 points 19 hours ago

I understand it. There is difference between buying from and shipping via.

Russian giant Rosatom "remains the main foreign player in mining in Kazakhstan" through its Canadian subsidiary Uranium One. Orano, the French state-owned group, also operates in Kazakhstan, but its output is almost entirely destined for Chinese customers.

This is what prompted my question.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Who all is still trading with Israel despite their genocide?

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 0 points 14 hours ago

Sorry I intruded on your "Russia is uniquely bad" circle jerk.