this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
203 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

79574 readers
3856 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That does it, I’m never installing Chrome again. I haven’t in years anyway because it’s garbage spyware, but still.

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 3 points 1 hour ago

I haven't in years anyway

Exactly why they can pull off anything like that. People who still stay with Chrome are mostly those who'll eat it up anyway.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 hours ago

I love software that acts without my consent or knowledge while atrophying my brain and wasting tremendous amounts of resources

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 21 points 13 hours ago

Chrome has added Auto Browse

sit down, lean back, and watch the internet scroll by /s

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

save us vivaldi you're our only hope

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Vivaldi is in big part closed source, so we literally don't know what it does behind the scenes

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The minority of Vivaldi is closed source from what I have read actually - specifically the stuff they have that makes its fancy UI work, but someone can correct me with a citation if that is not true.

They state that about 95% of it is available to be read where 92% of that is open source from Chromium, 3% is open source from Vivaldi themselves, and the last 5% that is not available to be read is Vivaldi's UI.

https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser-open-source/

Still far from open source or free software, but better than most people would think. I guess you would also have to trust them that it really is just the UI.

[–] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 6 minutes ago)

Exactly. Yes, I know they claim it's just the UI, and the sole purpose of closed-source code is to make it harder to steal innovative UI elements - but when it comes to something as sensitive as the browser, I'd like for these claims to be verifiable.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago

Nah, Firefox. Anything based on the blink engine is vulnerable to upstream fuckiness.

Ladybird is also getting there.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"Let's give everyone an army of spambots! What could go wrong?"

I'm gonna start reading books again.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago

I don't know if he joking or not but seriously I started reading again regularly like a year ish ago and I think my attention span getting better. Just not spending as much time scrolling bullshit is a big W along with practicing a longer attention span weather it's reading or something else. Go get a terry pratchet book !

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This actually sounds interesting.

"Find all comments on lemmy that are wrong. Respond explaining how they are wrong."

That would save me a lot of work.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Brilliant! You'll save us all a lot of work. Plus we will finally figure out which version of Linux is the correct one.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 41 points 1 day ago

I loathe (couldn’t figure out a synonym more than that) the word agentic. It sums up everything bad and wrong about AI.

[–] teft@piefed.social 97 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is one of those agents going to jerk off for you too? Who the fuck needs an agent to browse the web for them?

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I see someone didn't use Ask Jeeves back then /s

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It didn’t make sense then, and it doesn’t make sense now. Keyword searches with an understanding of search syntax was always king.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Keyword searches with an understanding of search syntax was always king.

Isn't that only because of the limitations of the available technology only being able to handle simple strings, though? Conversational computing has been a pipe dream since early sci-fi, where characters would talk to their computers as if they were human; George Jetson never spoke to Rosie in keyword queries.

I feel like keyword search syntax being "king" is more of a symptom, than an intentional choice.

[–] ainmosni@startrek.website 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You realise that the reason conversational computing is so popular in science fiction, is because it looks better on camera, right.

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 14 points 1 day ago

This is a very good point - in books/dramas it helps the exposition to have a character you can relay half the plot details to. Similarly in radio dramas, every conversation between characters starts with saying each others names and a full recap of whatever the subject is... But nobody in the real world does or wants to talk like that.

Real people just say "hey, is that thing fixed yet?", not "hello Chris, you remember yesterday we were discussing the il problem with the Thing, and you proposed Cornfootling it; what happened?"

When I want Alexa to turn on the lights, I want to just say "Alexa, turn on the lights", not have a goddamned debate. And when I want to search for whatever the hell Cornfootling is, I just want to type "Cornfootling" and hit search.

[–] tleb@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They want to push all this shit in browsers so that they can start automatically buying shit once they're selling ads

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

God, I hadn't thought of that. It's going to be like cancelling a cable subscription but worse.

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It will handle your socials, chats, your agenda, your website, your credit card, your vacations, your photos from the moment of activation to well after death....

[–] danh2os@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Are you trying to tell me that my computer will remember me better than my kids?

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago

No. The server will simply keep raising your kids after you're gone and better than you ever could.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All so you can spend more time generating value for your masters and overlords. Huzzah, we've eliminated the pesky scourge of free time!

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Also so they can easily predict who is with them and who is against them. Who’s got the hot new ideas so they can beat them to market. Who might challenge the status quo.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they marketed “Agentic AI” as a way for someone to disappear from the internet entirely and be replaced by AI, I’d finally get onboard.

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Basically don't know how to interpret "autobrowse" in any other way. Bit like "autopilot", you "should" have the hands on the steering wheel but...

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

You know what this is launching just in time for?

Tax season.

Cue* 10 million people getting audited because they let their browser file their taxes for them.

[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 6 points 20 hours ago

If they're auditing that many of them, there will be a queue, too.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, I realized that as soon as I posted it.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

lol as if the IRS is going to audit anyone now.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They will if you're not a rich fascist.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

they just don't have enough people. maybe they would target rich democrats, but in general audits are going to go way down out of necessity.

They don't need people. They have agentic browsers. Lolol

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Although one day even the fascists will realize there has to be income, no one's been collecting from the plebs, so they'll go back through... getting audited for multiple past years at once isn't fun, trust and believe. So be as honest as your AI will make you.

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Here's hoping they'll use the same model as their clients..

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In practice that looks like this: https://youtube.com/shorts/pjT0ubmENWk

It sure looks creepy when your browser suddenly starts doing all kinds of stuff.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No percent truth was in that video

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He did say it makes screenshots of everything and sends it to a cloud AI for processing. I believe that. It's also a good reason for not wanting it.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 15 hours ago

But nobody that has a functioning product has to fake their demo. This is extremely disturbing behavior when it comes to AI hype influencers

[–] bluegreenpurplepink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In reality, it's going to screw so much stuff up and do so many things you don't want it to do, that you're going end up spending a lot of time just correcting all the mistakes it makes.

And when you're not fighting to stop it from doing more things you don't want it to do, you're going spend your time worrying about what it will do next that you're going have to fix.

And unless you pay for the most expensive phone and the most expensive tier of service, they'll probably dumb it down on purpose and your life is going be hard.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

Mistake prevention is far better than mistake correction.

I'll be disabling that shit as soon as I install.