this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
477 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

10850 readers
2062 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 28 points 2 weeks ago

a perfect example of why you can't just go with the answer that seems to be the correct one in true Occam's Razor form, but usuing it as the starting point

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 28 points 2 weeks ago

Occam's Razor is about selecting the hypothesis with the least assumptions which is often mistaken for the simplest.

[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and Occam is probably some YouTuber and this is their product.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, that makes sense

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 2 weeks ago

"The most obvious answer is often the correct one", he said, nodding sagely.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The point is that is what you pick when two hypotheses are as likely.

Here there is one hypothesis so you can't apply it.

And if there is a second hypothesis, it should be something like "it's a reference to something specific" which is more likely than everyone talking about a specific razor of a random dude with a weird name.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's either a razor owned by ocham (simple) or it's a philosophical concept about decision making when presented with ideas of similar likelihood but varying complexity (complicated).

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think you're mixing up "complex" with "complicated." the first answer has no complexity (detail) and the second has a lot, but neither is complicated. You could make either sound more or less complex.

To actually compare them, the first should be "a shaving razor owned by Occam" and the second should be "a philosophical razor created by Occam." Now they have the same amount of detail, and the second is far simpler to understand why someone would know about it.

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The razor is about the option that requires the fewer assumptions.

The first one implies that somehow, a lot of people are talking about the razor of one guy with a very uncommon name. It is a much more costly hypothesis than to consider that this "razor" is an abstract concept instead.

[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well of course Occam’s razor would say that Occam’s razor is simply Occam’s razor

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's the simplest explanation. Why bother to come up with additional, more complex explanations?

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's well know that they are a member of that famous legal firm, Dunning, Kruger, & Occam.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There used to be a web store that sold a tshirt of a monk riding a scooter with the caption "Occam's razor" but I can't find it.

I don't want any AI bullshit either.

Edit: ddg didn't find it but Google sort of did.

[–] moonlight@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, that's the simplest explanation.