this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
71 points (100.0% liked)

Astronomy

6573 readers
78 users here now

A community for sharing astronomy-related news, content, research, photographs, etc.

When sharing photographs and articles, please make an effort to include source URLs.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How the is -94 degrees in any way habitable?

[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah and its not really habitable by humans. Its hard to just be there on Earth where there is oxygen.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

Habitability in this usage means "a place where humans can live, either with or without technological assistance". In terms of temperature, this means the range of temperatures where machinery can reliably function. Of the temperatures found in the universe, this machinery-functionable range is actually extremely narrow

[–] plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Same way mars is.

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's not really any data other than a rough distance from its star. The atmosphere could be thick enough and with the right combination of greenhouse gases that the temperature at the equator is 23°C year round. We do know that it's only receiving ~30% of the energy from its star as earth does from the sun, which is what they're basing the low temperature estimates on.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The article itself also says -70 which, still very cold, is much better.

[–] qupada@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

-70°C is -94°F

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And it's not like once we have the technology needed to travel 146 light years that we couldn't do something insane like deploy mirror-film solar cells or something to capture extra heat in orbit around the planet and warm the entire planet and terraform it for our usage.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 week ago

Once? I dont think any if that is close or even gauranteed.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Great, let’s get Bezos and chums on their way then.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Please tell me they've named it Hoth

[–] chrisfed@piaille.fr 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Innerworld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

-94F, sorry

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

First one and then the other.

omw, in our of here