Weird way of reporting by using the opposition's stance as a headline.
It's almost like they're trying to tell us what to think or something, lol.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Weird way of reporting by using the opposition's stance as a headline.
It's almost like they're trying to tell us what to think or something, lol.
Jesus Christ these people are deranged. All of the bullshit happening around us and they keep hammering trans people...
They're foaming at the mouth with their hate like a dog does when it has rabies.
With this Supreme Court?
Crazy that rules for birth certificates are not national.
That sounds like an argument for abolishing the fundamental parts of the united states.
It would be very bad thing if every governor and attorney general suddenly became as subject to Republican malfeasance as local mayors in Texas.
Also, there are some federal rules for what counts as special "birth certificates" to efficiently prove that a US citizen asking for a passport was born in the USA. But states don't have to follow them if they choose, and depending on their reason could presumably go to court to get the federal rule adjusted or discarded.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-51/subpart-C
The US Congress should be abolished and replaced with a Parliament that is responsible to the people.
Parliamentary systems are substantially more susceptible to facism and nationalism than multicameral legislatures with a separate executive.
And they're hardly proof against the sort of gerrymandering that makes the US House less responsive to general election voters than it should be.
Kind of wish we lived in a society where we didn't need them
"Do you have proof of birth?"
"Well I'm here, ain't I?"