Can you show me anywhere in the constitution that says you can't, because it is a responsibility of the people according to the constitution for the people to stop them from doing such shit.
Keep being the sheep you want to be. Get down on your knees and bow next.
He's pointing out what you posted says damages liability, which means something completely different. Basically means I couldn't have sued Regan for fucking over 90% of the American populous financially. It doesn't mean he has immunity to everything that is an official act. Big difference.
I'm the opposite, parents kept it in the fridge, if I know I'll use it, rolls and such all stay out.
Tomatoes also don't go in the fridge for me where my parents always used to. Unless I have no plans for them and they may have to sit a long time many fruits I just keep out.
Pick them out back, place on counter. Wash before eating... If I'm not lazy. My strawberries and black cherry tomatoes/pear tomatoes often dont all make it to the sink. Get hungry having to walk them 30 meters into the house.
Why bother, the president can just make an official act to suspend the elections as the country is being "invaded" by the southern border, and call it treason for anyone to oppose it. A lower court would do what? Say it is wrong and commit treason? Can arrest them faster than judges can have required cases.
The IT department would never be responsible for handing over said data. Backing it up, making sure it was recoverable, sure. But IT would have no actions with such.
I assume it would be the HR department or the administrators
No need to be, but this is a bad example because if the company can prove you were wreckless intentionally, they have an easy court case and someone now liable for all damages
They were 16, people that beat them up were "older girls". Surely they will charge them as adults right?
I get denied from jobs with security clearances because I have student loans debt / financial hardships when they run background checks. The president has the ability to declassify any documents... And he has been on recording sharing classified documents with non clearanced individuals.
Security must only impact peasants
My lady showed this to me so I figured I'd post it here... she may have been sending me a hint.
Exactly, ownership.
For the sake of the fuck.
THCDenton -Believes conservative groups don't actually want permanent bans on THC. All it will take is is to send 1 federal officer to arrest 1 distributor and a lot of them will suspend operations until the case goes through. Which the case is cut and dry, illegal in the U.S. They just didnt want to worry about turning away future voters. I'm not so sure there will be any future voters.