this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
274 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

80632 readers
3715 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Working in EMS feels like this, only you get paid worse somehow

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

At least you're doing something valuable

[–] XLE@piefed.social 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Is that seriously an "AI is like a child" poster made to motivate workers?

AI companies sure love to treat humans like machines, while humanizing machines.

[–] Darkness343@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Aren't humans just faulty organic machines anyways?

[–] XLE@piefed.social 9 points 5 hours ago

What a disgusting philosophy to have towards others. Please keep it to yourself.

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

To them, yeah. Worst part is they have to pay us enough to "live happily" instead of just keeping us in a box

[–] Darkness343@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I know. We should've made other organic machines by now but we are wasting time with metallic machines

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

Why not just use the "lesser" organic machines instead? Oh wait.

[–] Darkness343@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

That's what I've been wondering. We could've find a way to upgrade the animals. But no. We are wasting our technology in tricking rocks into thinking.

Didn't the useless scientists think about how much more progress we would get if we had others to think alongside us?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 106 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This world we create is so disgusting. Tech billionaires paying the least possible amount for "work" which borders slavery. And everyone seems to be OK with it.

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not just that it's slavery, but it's literally destroying the people doing it. Being exposed to so much horrendous content has lasting impact. It's like the coal mines (or any number of other body destroying examples) but it's not lungs that suffer, it's the brain.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

I'd argue that every kind of slavery literally destroys the slaves...kinda by definition :-( But yeah, this "job" is horrible. Especially if you don't even know what will suddenly hit you after you applied for a seemingly harmless job.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I would say that it wasn't us, the ordinary people, who created this terrible world, but we definitely allowed the worst among us to do so - and we even rewarded them for it, so that this monstrous world is now ruled by the most ruthless, like a monarchy that was believed to have been overcome. Apparently, civilizational progress is not bound to the passage of time, as I strongly suspect that we are regressing civilizational: back to absolutism with its degenerate rulers who give free rein to their perverse desires - and they can do so, because they are at the top of a society they exploit with impunity.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Well put and yes, that's sadly true. We just sit there and watched people seize control who should never have had ANY kind of control over anything in the first place. This species sadly highly rewards the psychological dark triad (or tetrad) so well, it hurts. The worst that humanity has to offer has the highest chance to lead it. Not even a question of sex or race or anything, it's just us.

[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm honestly so sick of this sick world we live in. Lately it just seems like the veil has slipped and we can see how truly depraved the rich and powerful are and we are not able to do anything significant to change it.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

The sick world you live in is online. It's not real. The world you see through your black mirror isn't the same as the one you see outside the window. News has always been a litany of human misery. Online news is pure and condensed human suffering.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

We are, but we’d have to give up a lot.

However, they keep taking more and more. So how long before they take enough that giving up the rest is worth it?

Rotten, sure. Nothing new. It's been a top/down rule for all of human history.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

They use AI to pre-select training data anyway. Can't they categorize good content with it? Whitelist vs. blacklist.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Who do you think will train the AI to whitelist things?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The filter-AI that is itself trained to recognize only good content. Right now, they use all except some bad.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I know it's a horrible job, but at this point I wouldn't mind trading some sanity to pay the bills.

Crazy world.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People watch hours of traumatic content all day voluntarily.

How many people have you seen being killed this year? Probably more than most people ever see in their entire lives (before computers).

That trauma adds up for everyone

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

"None" is not a huge number. Why would i want to watch someone die?

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

It has been long time since social media cared about showing us things that we wanted to see.

There have been several shootings that have had massive social media impact, you may have avoided them (and you did the right thing) but a huge amount of people experienced witnessing their first shooting death and maybe 2nd, 3rd and 4th this year. That's a lot of cumulative psychological stress being inflicted on society and it isn't like we're living in a world that is otherwise a calming paradise...

Social media is inflicting real harms and the people in control don't seem very motivated to try to control them. Or, they did try in tests and determined that Engagement was more profitable and they're shielded from the externalities so who cares really?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

and determined that Engagement was more profitable

Yep, just in today.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I now avoid all videos showing deaths or serious injuries (if I know that kind of content is coming).

Feels better to not have those images in my mind.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The same thing happens, to a much lesser extent, when you read emotionally charged headlines. Having your mental health being constantly bombarded with outrage, anger, fear, etc may be good for social media companies and their Engagement metrics, but it's very bad for each individual (and also society).

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's astonishing how much better your mental health is if you stay off social media even for a few days.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1000% Even on Lemmy, my default view is my subscribed communities and none of them are political so, outside of Linux v Windows drama and associated memes I don't have to see much outrage (not counting Mint users, smh)

The best tip I've found is to delete the apps and force yourself to use the web interface (and turn on private mode in your browser so it clears your cookies ever time so you have to type your username and password each time).

Adding that little bit of friction is enough to overcome the random compulsions to check social media. Not that typing in your username and password is hard, but it is annoying enough that you'll avoid it usually.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Ignorance is indeed bliss.