this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
123 points (98.4% liked)

politics

28561 readers
2418 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Democratic leaders unveiled their official list of demands ahead of the deadline on Wednesday, calling for ending indiscriminate arrests, prohibiting masking, requiring ICE and CBP officer identification, protecting sensitive locations such as churches and schools, halting racial profiling, upholding use of force standards, preserving the ability of states and cities to prosecute DHS misconduct, and requiring the use of body cameras when interacting with the public. (Schumer and Jeffries immediately began watering down one of their clearest demands, suggesting in public comments that they might allow agents to wear masks in some circumstances.)

The biggest split between what Schumer and Jeffries proposed and what more progressive Democrats requested was a reduction of spending on ICE and CBP.

Those agencies received $75 billion and $64 billion, respectively, in last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act to be spent through 2029. That money came on top of the amounts already available to the agencies through their annual appropriations.

Clawing that money back has been a top priority for advocates, who note that it has been used to supercharge hiring and spending on surveillance technology.

“These demands MUST include cuts in funding,” Heidi Altman, the vice president of policy at the National Immigration Law Center, said in an email last week. “The money pays for the violence. It has to stop.”

Last month, Sanders proposed an amendment to the DHS appropriations bill that would have redirected the additional ICE funding to Medicaid, which he estimated would prevent 700,000 Americans from losing their health care.

Sanders’s amendment drew the support of every Senate Democrat and two Republicans, but it failed on a 49–51 vote.

Democratic leadership figures like Schatz have described the latest demands as an attempt at reaching consensus.

“They are not a Democratic wish list. We are simply asking that ICE not be held to a different standard than every other law enforcement organization in the country — state, county, and federal,” he told reporters Wednesday.

The requests fell with a thud with Republican leaders, however. Johnson has already ruled out banning masks and requiring warrants.

Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., the lead GOP negotiator, called the demands “a ridiculous Christmas list of demands for the press.”

Republicans have already floated the idea of another short-term extension of DHS funding to allow further negotiations.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 47 points 2 weeks ago

What the fuck are Democrats even doing.

Replace Schumer as leader. Put Bernie in charge. Put Van Hollen in charge.. Stop losing. Stop accepting failure from these Democrats.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I never want to hear about "Schumer's soft package" again

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ok.

Schumer's pulsating, rock-hard package...

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Wtf is this headline 🤣?! Literally everybody is at that level of "Everything is going to collapse around us anyway and we may all die soon... We probably will, so do we really still have to keep pretending to be respectful/taking this shit seriously when they won't?" I mean if so I get it, solidarity. Like what is the point of pretending?

Anyway, headline aside, this is why you don't negotiate with terrorists. They had them and they let them go with a slap on the wrist and a 2 week extension. How can anybody be surprised they're demanding more and more now and trying to regain the ground they lost? The more you go easy on them or try to give, the more they will try to take. They will never compromise.

“The urgency of the moment is about stopping the violence,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told The Intercept. “If it were up to me, we would be rewriting the whole immigration laws and policies. But right now, we’ve got to get some constraints in place so that roving bands of ICE agents stop terrorizing American communities. That is our first priority.”

By now they have to know there is no stopping them until Trump feels like he has to stop them, right? Maybe they realize nothing they try to negotiate will make a difference, so they put the reasonable offer on the table expecting it to be refused? Like if they let it shut down now, I guess at least they walk away looking like they tried to be reasonable and negotiate first..? Please God just don't let them fold completely or keep trying to water down a compromise🙏

I don't know, something about Chuck Schumer's soft, meaty package.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

Don't want to hurt his feewings

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

Schumer is garbage.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Schumer is a traitor. shove his fucking glasses up his ass

[–] Gust@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

There are more direct ways to call Schumer a limp dick coward, but this one is good enough

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

I love that ending. Its just a christmass list of what the american people want to see! At least that is how I read it.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Am I feeling hungry or horny after reading that headline?

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You think they made a deal to save themselves and ship us all off to Shartersville