this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
146 points (99.3% liked)

World News

54680 readers
3065 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The world is closer than thought to a “point of no return” after which runaway global heating cannot be stopped, scientists have said.

Continued global heating could trigger climate tipping points, leading to a cascade of further tipping points and feedback loops, they said. This would lock the world into a new and hellish “hothouse Earth” climate far worse than the 2-3C temperature rise the world is on track to reach. The climate would also be very different to the benign conditions of the past 11,000 years, during which the whole of human civilisation developed.

The public and politicians were largely unaware of the risk of passing the point of no return, the researchers said. The group said they were issuing their warning because while rapid and immediate cuts to fossil fuel burning were challenging, reversing course was likely to be impossible once on the path to a hothouse Earth, even if emissions were eventually slashed.

The assessment, which was published in the journal One Earth, synthesised recent scientific findings on climate feedback loops and 16 tipping elements. The tipping elements include the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, mountain glaciers, polar sea ice, sub-Arctic forests and permafrost, the Amazon rainforest and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (Amoc), a system of ocean currents that strongly influences the global climate.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 31 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Shame the 100s that rule the world don't give a fuck.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

They are stupid idiots much like the Nazis that have narcissistic fantasies of eternal life, eugenics, transhumanism, genetic superiority, overconfidence in their own intellect, overconfidence in AI, overconfidence in the loyalty of those around them and an inability to self reflect.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 26 points 4 weeks ago

Meanwhile heads of European industry are gathering in Belgium this week to discuss the lowering of European climate goals, as it impacts their bottom line 🤦

The Buy European question is only one part of a sprawling summit agenda taking place at Alden Biesen in Limburg, an estate founded in the 13th century by Teutonic knights. Leaders will also discuss deregulation, fragmented capital markets that constrain green and digital investment, as well as barriers in the European single market that hamper trade.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/12/eu-leaders-clash-buy-european-belgium-summit

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

A "hothouse Earth" scenario can be prevented in two ways:

  1. reduction of emissions and increasing carbon uptake
  2. waiting for things to hit the fan, and then reducing the amount of sunlight arriving on Earth

Choice 1 is obviously a dozen times more preferable. Choice 2 will be almost inevitable if making choice 1 fails, and could bring about unforeseen risks.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 weeks ago

Snowpiercer timeline here we come then.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

2 is just another form of death.

[–] Kyle@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 weeks ago

"Don't look up! Don't look up! Don't look up!"

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't read one of these "past the point of no return" articles in at least a month. The end is nigh and we were the makers of our own destruction all along, gets pulled out every so often, throughout history. The thing is, when it finally happens, it'll be true.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

When what finally happens? We're a frog in a pot, there is no point where things suddenly get a thousand times worse, it happens gradually. Until the frog finally jumps out, except we can't.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There kinda is, as at some point the heating hits a stage where the oceans will warm up enough, and as warm water can't hold on to as much Co2, it will be released into the atmosphere, which causes the oceans to warm up, which releases Co2, which causes... And so on.
Add in some ice melting and stuff like that, and once the feedback loop starts properly, there's not much we can do to stop it.

We are a frog in a pot where we know someone is going to put a lid on it eventually, and we keep arguing and contemplating about when and how soon it might happen, instead of working on getting out of the pot before it does.