this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
115 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42471 readers
550 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] artyom@piefed.social 38 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

tl;dr "Discord told Kotaku its work with Persona was part of a “limited test” which has since been concluded."

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

. They will still use palantir. This is a pr maneuver

[–] tracelr402@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The cost benefit ratio of straight up lying in PR statements and privacy policies has become such that they're less than worthless to readers

[–] MalReynolds@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yup, but not worthless to their lawyers, so they're full of weasel words and yet still bind the consumer to horrible conditions. Yay, late stage capitalism.

[–] HoodieGyaru@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 weeks ago

Discord needs to distance itself from age verification itself.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 weeks ago

"Distances" isn't the same as "severing ties from".

Cancel the contract, you fucks!

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

That it happened pnce is enough to never trust them again

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don’t know how all these tech companies keep making obviously stupid and immoral decisions like this.

“We need someone to process our emails.”

“Oh well we have two options. This one costs a hundredth of a cent less per email, but they also run their machines on the blood of children and they ritualistically sacrifice minorities as part of their business model.”

“You said a hundredth of a cent? Perfect!”

[–] Unusable3151@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you answered your own question. To expect them to do anything other than what will increase their wealth is naïve. Anything that seemed like a "moral" thing that they did in the past simply happened to be more convenient.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah, I suppose so. It just sucks that it seems like every single company is run by a monster.

[–] Deyis@beehaw.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Because companies have a legal responsibility to increase value to shareholders; morals don't enter into it.

[–] Unusable3151@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Only people who are okay with being monsters are allowed to take and keep those roles. That's capitalism, baby.

[–] madjo@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

Oh sure... I wonder what other Palantir front they will do business next.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 7 points 3 weeks ago

Still worth migrating away since they've gone public a bunch of villains sit on the board who'll look to profit off your data.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

I’m glad I clicked off a service that required Persona verification.