uMmMmM aCkTuALLy
Taking the work of artists without compensating them for your own commercial gain is ethically bankrupt and theft. The fact that you keep likening an AI model to actual person demonstrates that this isn't a conversation worth continuing.
If looking at a picture is stealing. . .
Except that's not what AI and those who use it are doing. This is a deliberate oversimplification to try to excuse derivative and copied works of artists who have had their art stolen. When you do it, it's copyright infringement. When AI does it, you get a deluge of people who lack the patience and discipline to actually produce any creative work trying to excuse it.
Can't wait for the AI to start giving me tips based on a previous entry in a series because that's all it knows about, referring to mechanics which no longer exist and set-ups which are no longer possible.
The absolute certainty that they are smarter and better than other people. It's the same with anti-vax bollocks and homeopathy.
The ignorance of Saudi human rights abuses has to be deliberate at this point.
Why anyone is still traveling to the US for a vacation under the current Republican regime is beyond me.
I was planning on going to the US a few years ago but cancelled all plans indefinitely as it simply isn't safe. I don't think I'll ever go to the US again at this rate.
Not wanting to sell a product isn't censorship of the product. That's a fundamental misunderstanding of what censorship is.
The majority of countries where Steam sells games have strict laws regarding the depiction of minors in any kind of situation which could be considered sexual, whether it's a real child or not. It's a very strange hill to die on when the devs clearly identified that was the issue and removed it from their game.
Whether you believe a platform should get backlash for platforming something in questionable taste and legality is entirely separate to whether they actually will.
Sure but you must realise that if Steam were to platform a game featuring a child riding a naked adult in a horse mask, a sequence that the devs have removed in order to have the game on any platform for sale at all, Steam would face a significant amount of backlash and potential legal action for doing so. Why should Steam be obligated to publish a game?
There's already been extensive discussion about this already; the whole thing stinks of the dev trying to get extra publicity because the fucked around and found out.
It feels like such an American thing that when the person you believe to be the guy with the direct line to God tells you to not act like fascist dickheads, you say "nuh-uh, you need to believe what we believe immediately".