this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

5911 readers
102 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Recently was told by a Christian to look into eucharistic miracles.

These are when the bread and wine at mass literally turns into flesh and blood.

Apparently these were tested and found to come from a living heart with AB Blood. And all the sources I find list them as verified real.

I can't find any contradicting resources.

So I'm wondering if anyone has one. Cause this just doesn't smell right. The Bible is a self contradicting mess and prayer has already been shown not to work, but somehow God saved his real evidence for randomly trolling priests by turning wine into blood?

I don't know about that one.

I will confess most of the resources I found covering them were Catholic in origin, which are hardly trustworthy (another reason why I'm not buying it)

Anyone here more adept at googling shit who can tell me how this is bogus?

Don't get me wrong. I'd love for God to be real but the paranormal has an atrocious track record.

Edit: Apparently it was a bacterial fungus. Thanks for helping me figure it out.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

To know how or why a specific miracle is forged you need information about that specific claim, the testing done on it, by whom, and how the samples were collected and transported.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 2 hours ago

I used to be Catholic. Every Sunday, they performed the transubstantiation on the hosts and the wine. Every Sunday, I subjected both to analysis by one of the most sensitive chemical sensing device in the world.

Every week, it came back as Styrofoam and wine. Never once was it meat or blood.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 3 hours ago

Dont bother just walk away.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't see you link any of your sources, but I'll bite:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11882681/

https://www.forensicscijournal.com/index.php/jfsr/article/view/jfsr-aid1068

Also:

For example, in 2006, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas gave over a Eucharist host that turned red while in a glass for the analysis by two University of Dallas biology professors who concluded it was naturally explicable, as Bishop Charles Victor Grahmann wrote that "… the object is a combination of fungal mycelia and bacterial colonies that have been incubated within the aquatic environment of the glass during the four-week period in which it was stored in the open air.

-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucharistic_miracle#Scientific_analysis_of_flesh_and_blood_miracles

I got that off the first page of a DDG search (no AI) for: eucharistic miracles study nih

Please do not reply. Or at least try to sound like less of a troll in any reply to me than in the rest of your posts in this thread.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Thank you. I don't know why I was mistaken for a troll.

This is indeed what I asked for and it works just fine as a debunk.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You answered your own question: all the "evidence" is provided by the church itself. You haven't found any independent, peer-reviewed evidence.

I can say I opened a can of tomato sauce and tests showed it to be type AB blood. Doesn't mean you should believe me, even if I spread it to lots of websites.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes but some of the scientists they got to study it were atheists (though one later converted) and they'd have to go along with the lie.

If it were the church saying they studied it themselves that'd be one thing. But the scientists they hired were not of the vatican.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Did the information that they were atheists come from the church? Also, did the experiments carefully make sure that the wine was not switched out for blood in the test? You gotta think like James Randi here.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The blood came from a living heart and was the rarest blood type, AB Positive. This was consistent in every "miracle", so unless the Vatican had blood from that overly specific criteria in large amounts just sitting around a switch seems unlikely.

If it wasn't the same blood type each time and from a very specific region of the body, that might be more obvious an answer.

And I'd rather not think like a guy with high school education who got Kicked out of a skeptical organization he helped found for being bad at the scientific method

Seriously Randi is overrated and he served as the science advisor on the False Memory Foundation.... which was an organization that gaslit rape victims into thinking they suffered a fake syndrome that causes them to form false traumatic memories.

Susan Blackmore is a much better person to look up to

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago

Again: I can say a can of tomato sauce tested as AB positive blood.

There was no actual study and wine did not actually turn into blood.

And the Vatican had nothing to do with it.

Ordinary people spread lies in order to convince others to believe in their church. That's all this is.

[–] Pricklesthemagicfish@reddthat.com 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the laugh I needed that today. Did you try running your question through catholic gpt?

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what I did was amusing. I am asking for help debunking because I can only find catholic resources talking about it.

I'd like to see what skeptics have to say but I can't find anything. Hence why I'm asking for assistance.

Why would I ask another Catholic source if my problem is I can't find a non-catholic source?

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We are skeptics. We are telling you. It's all bullshit. It doesn't even come from the Catholic church, it comes from folks who make up stories to try and convince others their religion is real.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Apparently it was a mold that false positived as blood