this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
172 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

4080 readers
119 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redparadise@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is having your literal banking info not enough to prove you're over 18?

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 23 hours ago

Yeh, why not make billing able to carry ages verification?
Banks have to verify their customers. They (mostly) have a history of handling data well, it's in their interest/requirement to continue doing that.
The banking sector is well regulated compared to software/startups.

That can remove a large amount of service providers suddenly needing age verification. Just rely on the service purchase to verify it

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fucking why? Being able to link a bank account for ad payments isn't enough to prove adulthood?

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the whole reason is not “verify you are an adult”. It’s for anti-bot. Bots are too good nowadays. It’s indistinguishable at scale. And bots are bad for advertisers.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 11 points 23 hours ago

That's one hot take... Advertisers don't care if the streamer is a bot, they care if the viewer is a bot. Mega-corpo's ideal solution is 100% bot streamers and 100% real people viewers.

This isn't age verification, or anti-bot. This is straight up fulfilling surveillance contracts with the US government. They don't even need to justify it, they are holding money hostage instead.

[–] JakenVeina@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but this is affiliates we're talking about. There's already plenty of process for proving that affiliatesnare humans, not the least of which is the fact that they STREAM themselves.

[–] l3enc@piefed.ee 5 points 1 day ago

huh haven't used that platform in years, guess I minght as well delete my account

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago

Welp.. time to bail on Twitch now too..

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's gonna be a big 'nope' from me. I wonder if that's US-only, though.

[–] Polkira@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

The person on Bluesky mentioned they are Canadian :\

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

Bye bye, Twitch.

[–] three@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You'll never see huge complaints from established streamers; because much like boomers, "LULW fuck you, got mine".

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Why power does an affiliate have to protest this?

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you ever heard the saying "don't bite the hand that feeds you." If you are a full time streamer it is literally the hand that feeds them. The streamers are in it for the ride. For every "lolz fuck you i got mine" there are 1000 streamers just making content.

[–] three@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Nope, never heard of it.

[–] Whimsical418@aussie.zone 6 points 1 day ago

I'm surprised the crowd here hasn't already left twitch. I haven't for a while, since I realised Amazon was involved and was becoming more aware of the online services I used.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, the giving the deets to Persona part is pretty crap, but requiring ID seems to be pretty normal to me? I'm pretty sure affiliates count as contractors, so needing ID to verify would be standard. They are just using a service that happens to be shitty to do the validation.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not sure why you're being downvoted.

I have to give my ID to buy website hosting. I have to give it to open a bank. I have to provide it for setting up a e-commerce store.

Like, what privacy are you expecting when money is exchanging hands between a major company and a person - one that is required to track all those details and hand them to their government?

You expecting Twitch to pay you in crypto?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago

Who is asking you to provide ID to purchase or rent a web hosting server?

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What ID are you providing for web hosting? Literally never done this, just payables info.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I needed my driver's license to prove that I was who I said I was with my credit card with ionos.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Crazy. I had Hetzner, Vultr, Linode, Rackspace (back in the day when they did that), never had to prove my identity.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, the giving the deets to Persona part is pretty crap, but requiring ID seems to be pretty normal to me? I'm pretty sure affiliates count as contractors, so needing ID to verify would be standard. They are just using a service that happens to be shitty to do the validation.

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If Persona or Palantir were not involved it would be more likely to not be surveillance state shit. But this is obviously not the case. If they wanted to do actually id verification they would use banks or pay a government service. What people are not getting is that in this exchange, you are the product. Palantir was paying Discord to gather our data to track us and sell our data to Palantir's main client. They backed down because it is more profitable to keep all their customers than integrate with Palantir to sell our data and lose x amount of customers.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 1 points 57 minutes ago

Twitch isn't requiring all users upload ID, just affiliates who get paid out for subscriptions/bits. That's such a small portion of people on the site that I sincerely doubt they are even able to sell that data.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You need to fill tax info and everything, which is a very good reason to not need ID because your tax number should be identifying already. I guess they want to combat fraud, but this still seems like a complete overreach.

[–] Arcadeep@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's not about combatting fraud