Free and Open Source Software

21954 readers

9 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

-10

Firefox’s AI Kill Switch is a Trap: How Mozilla Made AI Your Problem (media.fedia.io)

submitted 2 days ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/foss@beehaw.org

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TL;DR: Mozilla recently released AI controls for Firefox: a single control panel that lets people disable AI features in the browser or pick and choose which to leave on. On the surface, this sounds like a win for user choice in an era of AI-everything.

If we dig deeper, you can start to see that the kill switch isn’t the whole story. This feature acts like an accountability sink. By giving you an off-switch, Mozilla’s leadership shifts the ethical burden of AI onto the user - turning their design choices into your responsibility.

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] kittenroar@beehaw.org 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I disagree. Being able to choose which llm features I want is a win, and being able to use a local llm to translate language is better than sending data to Google to do that.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You are aware translation services are available that are neither a local LLM nor Google-owned, yes? We had machine translation before ChatGPT existed, and I don't think that tech evaporated in a sudden fire just because a more harmful option appeared.

The appropriate option for Mozilla would've been to not include AI at all. If they really, really couldn't have swung that (they could've), then the second best option would be having all AI features set to off-by-default. Instead, we've got on-by-default. That is unambiguously a terrible idea.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pre-LLM translation services also generally used AI, just via more traditional machine learning. The only difference is introducing a locally run LLM.

If it runs locally and is openly available, then it doesn't make much difference to me if it's a traditional model or a LLM.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

Considering the negative impacts LLMs have on so many facets of life today, that's kinda the problem. Running it locally only solves some of those.

Fundamentally though, I just don't want the tech involved in my life at all anymore. I don't care if it has a niche use here or not. It can just fuck off.