this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
216 points (99.1% liked)

memes

20574 readers
996 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not stupid if it works.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's one of these reddit phrases i'll never understand. Things can work and be very stupid.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is something tradesmen have said for a very long time. I think the original meaning has been lost online.

"It's not stupid if it works" is basically a tacit admission that something stupid is happening, we all agree that it's stupid, and we also kind of all know that there is a better way, but for some reason we're not doing that.

Usually it feels like the stupid thing we're about to do is the best option available to us.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

As a trademan, an addition: it's usally used in a situation that needed a quick fix, and only needs to hold together for a short period. Usally this the short period gets extended because "it's still working".

[–] ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing is as permanent as a temporary fix.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I always liked “it’ll look great from my house”

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe more like this: „If it works as intended, an unconventional approach is justified.“

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The purpose of a system is what it does?

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not at all. "The purpose of a system is what is does" is a phrase that makes it clear that in a system where a lot of people work in, "purpose" is a useless concept and should never be used to tell if it's a good or a bad system.

It's an entirely political view of a system, and has no relation to the implementation being stupid or not.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maxim 43 If it's stupid and it works, It's still stupide ans you're lucky.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

It's not that the first one is completely impossible, but we're not quite there yet technologically. And even if we could build the first one, the second one would probably be less than a 1000th of the price to make.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

Would you rather have 1 of option A or 1000 of option B?

Kind of depends on what your specific goals are, but 1000 to 1 odds tend to tilt things in option B's favor.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Even if it's not completely impossible, it would be completely useless. What would be the point of rotary chain guns on a drone? Assuming the thing had enough lifting capacity to carry the barrels, there isn't enough space in that thing to carry enough ammo to fire for more than a second.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was assuming they'd be some kind of laser weapon or something

You'd kinda run into the same issue either way, you'd either have not enough ammo or not enough battery storage. Plus, there isn't really a reason to have rotary barrels on something like a laser. They would theoretically be more of a sustained fire kind of weapon.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

WTF is option 1 even supposed to be? Looks like a device producing extremely much engine noise to me.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Stark Industry Combat Drones from Spiderman: Far From Home

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is option B a bomb? Is it drugs?

[–] SomeRandomNoob@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Explosive drugs? Drugs that are to be exploded?

[–] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ahh my loving sister