this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
24 points (83.3% liked)

Mildly Interesting

25608 readers
766 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Title:

There are no psychopaths, but the idea persists.

Article:

Psychopathy may not exist at all.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

Laughed more at Rasmus’s “gaslight idea

[–] Senal@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The DSM doesn't include that specific diagnosis any more right, it's all the ASPD and DPD spectrum now ?

They removed it because of the absolute shitshow that was trying to reliably diagnose psychopathy as it was originally described.(and possibly the negative connotations associated with the word itself)

So now they have a series of metrics to measure things they can somewhat reliably measure over time.

Like how the medical diagnosis of idiot doesn't exist anymore, but there are more accurate and nuanced terms and diagnosis for intellectual disabilities in various forms.

I could be wrong however, my understanding of this area of research is middling at best.

[–] janonymous@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

There are no idiots, but the idea persists

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pyschopaty never existed as a diagnostic.

It's akin to a doctor diagnosing you with "sick". It is nonspecific, arbitrary and useless to inform treatment or prognosis. It was used as a descriptor by very early psychiatry, but it was never a distinct diagnosis.

We just think there are because so many people act like psychopaths

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I thought we had long decided that a psychopath was a sociopath with extra steps.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

As with most things like this it's probably a spectrum rather than something you either are or are not. It's easy to tell when someone is in the far end of that spectrum but the line where it officially crosses into psychopathy is always going to be arbitrary.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is a laymans term for someone without a conscience whose actions usually result in hurting people.

It describes a wild range of behavior from something like your ex acting like a "psychopath" to a murderer. For this reason it isn't useful in a legal or medical sense.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

There are no psychopaths, only Zuul

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 week ago

That was ... mildly interesting.