may
No. They've been doing it for years.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
may
No. They've been doing it for years.
"Because it benefits Russia" is honestly the most cogent reason I've heard for his obsession with Greenland.
So launch an information campaign to counter the misinformation.. why are politicians always so passive about this? They always make it sound like only the right wing can spread on social media. It’s like they don’t want to win. Or don’t have / understand their principles to run an appealing information campaign.
If the right wing wins, liberals get to be the heroes from their stories as they heroically beat back the fascist menace. If the left wing wins, liberals are the villains and people dance on their graves. So I get why their heart isn't in it.
As for leftists spreading leftist information.... Hi! We don't have capitalists funding us so it's just me right now.
The problem isn’t funding. Using AI to generate content, as well as paying people to comment isn’t that expensive. That’s all the right wing does. And it’s not just the left currently, but the democratic establishment, who have the problem with the right wing propaganda too, and they’re well funded too.
Russia and the USA have a long history of election interference around the world.
We (USA/NATO/EU) can't even agree to stop buying their oil, so they are flush with cash
The US is not buying Russian oil.
You are incorrect, Rainbowhedgehog.
Correction: The US is no longer importing directly but there may be some through shadow refineries that still end up in Russia's pockets. The US has taken no action in stopping investing. So the US can still invest, get dividends, etc.
So the US is buying stake in Russian Oil companies and making profits from it.
In other news: water is wet.
And on the other hand, Trump now claims that China interfered in the 2020 election. Because Hunter Biden. How to separate fake news from real news? Easy, don't listen to the MAGA admin.
I am sure China tried to influence it. When you don't have to actually run real elections yourself it leaves plenty of time to interfere with others.
Is it a distraction? Of course.
the US has a shit show and I know this but Putin has been doing this for year and nothing has been done. The only way he will stop is if he is made to stop. Maybe it is time to strike and take him out. Europe has the means so stop playing around.