Det ligner et hun har givet et politikker svar. Hun står ikke inde for sit eget valg. Ellers er det en fejl.
Det mest overraskende ved mit eget resultat var at jeg åbenbart er 50% enig med den som jeg er mest uenig med, selvom jeg svarede ret ekstremt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denazification
Soviet zone: From the beginning, denazification in the Soviet zone was considered a critical element of the transformation into a socialist society and was quickly and effectively implemented. Members of the Nazi Party and its organizations were often brutally beaten before being arrested and interned. The NKVD was directly in charge of this process and oversaw the camps. In 1948, the camps were placed under the same administration as the gulag in the Soviet government. According to official records, 122,600 people were interned; 34,700 of those interned in this process were considered to be Soviet citizens, with the rest being German
Let's math: 122600-34700= 87900 Germans.
Former Nazi officials quickly realized that they would face fewer obstacles and investigations in the zones controlled by the Western Allies. Many of them saw a chance to defect to the West on the pretext of anti-communism. Conditions in the internment camps were terrible, and between 42,000 and 80,000 prisoners died.
Sure they never directly stated that they deliberately wanted to kill all the Nazi, but the result is still that they did kill a good chunk of them (between 50-90%) in the camps.
Problemerne er store nok
Hvilke problemer?
Immigration fra Ukraine har aldrig været et problem og det er deres flygtninge heller ikke. De arbejder og betaler skat og er taknemmelige for det.
Det eneste problem er at de stiller den danske arbejdsmoral i et dårligt lys.
Why don't you two find a room and talk about games.
Do they have to agree on the answer?
If not, then you can add their experiences. They'll share some but it's a net plus.
If they do have to agree, then they can only answer when they have shared experiences, in which case it'd be a net negative.
It's basically two arrays of binary numbers, either they know something or they don't, and then you can do boolean algebra to get the kind of answer you want.
In reality you will encounter both situations, and by using dialogue, you can sort out the differences and achieve a higher rate of correct answers.
This way, two idiots can indeed answer more correctly than one expert. However it's required that the idiots are aware of their own shortcomings.
The history of denazifying Germany shows that the Allies were torn on this.
To summerize:
Russia "Okay, let's kill all the Germans."
Britain "Oh, but then we're no better than them. We must make due process for all the Nazis."
USA "Yeah, I don't think either of you understand the scale of this."
And the Americans was right. A due process would have taken centuries, and nobody wanted to pay for it.
So that's why the Nuremberg trials only reached the top of the iceberg and millions of Nazis got away with no other punishment than memories of shame.
It's lice. You get 300 million lice.
Now, can you build the potato clocked, huh?
I usually refrain myself from commenting on other people's appearances, because God knows I was last in queue, but when someone goes out of their way, and spends lots of money to look like a clown, it's only fair for them and everyone else to laugh at them.
Plastic doesn't age well I see.
She's 54. Act like it.
Lemmy is too small for it to make sense. I can easily read through all threads all the way through the controversial posts and still run out of content daily.
It made sense on Reddit, where accounts could be worth money and/or used for advertising, or some people thought karma points was worth it, or that posts there had influence, which they did for a while. The Unidan affair was only about votes, and showed how a single user manipulated the majority of readers into something that was WRONG ON THE INTERNET, which should be a crime.
Finally there's also people who view everything as a competition and just want the high score in that imaginary game. Endorphins or something. I'll admit that I have a longer streak than necessary in some apps too, but I'm no cheater. I wouldn't get my high off that anyway.
I rarely downvote, but then again, every upvote is like downvoting everyone else, and I surely don't want to upvote everything.
Ja det ser forkert ud. Det kunne være interessant at skrive til kandidaten og tjekke om TV2 har lavet vildledende fejl i deres test.