Interestingly, Trump's floor has been 30% so this is actually pissing off his own die-hards.
New York Times gift articles
Share your New York Times gift articles links here.
Rules:
- Only post New York Times gift article links.
Info:
- The NYT Open Team. (2021-06-23). “A New Way to Share New York Times Stories”. open.nytimes.com.
- “Gift Articles for New York Times Subscribers”. (n.d.). help.nytimes.com.
Tip:
- Google "unlocked_article_code" and limit search results to the past week.
- Mastodon: Use control-F or ⌘-F to search this page. (ref)
Yep, that and Epstein has clued in even some real dumb bastards.
I'm not sure they learned the actual lessons but it appears at least some of them were genuinely anti-forever-war.
You mean if we USE our Constitutional Powers to STOP this WAR then the MAJORITY of Americans, in an ELECTION year, will LOVE us? Let's NOT do That!
-Congress!
The majority of people don't like the war, but the majority of ~~bribes~~ campaign funds do.
Finally, some decent poll numbers. But, what sort of mental gymnastics did the 21% perform to continue the "No new wars" President?
Oh, wait, that's not why the supported him in the first place. I get it. It was probably that thing they're always pointing at with a flat open hand, and extended arm.
21% of people would support cutting off their own toes. Poll numbers don’t get much lower in practice.
You can get 30% of the population to agree to literally anything which just goes to show they're being lazy bastards about this
Iran has been pretty consistent in their "Fuck the USA" messaging for a long time. I'm actually surprised its that low given how many of them supported his stances on Greenland and Canada.
double digits is still a large number of genociders.
Well with so little popular support clearly that won't... oh. Wait, oh no.
I might support it if they went ahead and took out all the religious leaders. Yes, that one too.