this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
724 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

46871 readers
765 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I really hope motorolla just does a regular unaltered Graphene OS and not some skinned version of it

[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This genuinely so fucking smart from Motorola. Whomever is greenlighting this needs major kudos. We're in a world where everyone wants to move away from US technology now and Google/Apple have monopolized the market. Motorola is making this move RIGHT when everywhere else is going "Is there literally nothing else we can use???" Good play esp as they need to up the specs on a new device to handle Graphene. I am looking forward to seeing what they come up with.

[–] devnev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't Motorola still a US company though? How is this a move away from US tech?

[–] seedd@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nope, moto mobility is owned by lenovo. So chinese.

[–] devnev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looking at Wikipedia now, Motorola Mobility is owned by Lenovo but still a US based company, so kinda the worst of both, no?

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Better than American owned and operated.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since when is Graphene's logo a football and Motorola's the Super Mario M?

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago

It's AI slop.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 122 points 2 days ago (16 children)

While I'm happy that it's Motorola, i just wish someone like Fairphone also bites the bullet of investing in a proper encryption chip that's acceptable to Grapheneos. I'd like to see more or a trifecta (duofecta?) of trustworthy OS and sustainable/committed manufacturer.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Now is this the REAL Motorola or is it the brand name that Lenovo got a hold of. Cause real Motorola doesnt make consumer phones anymore.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Lenovo's Motorola, if you ask me. I don't think there's much left at all from original Motorola. But they had a decent track record with their recent phones, AFAIK. Not that I've owned any from Motorola.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skarn@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

GrapheneOS requires I think a few other things, like the possibility to completely disable the data lines in the USB port, and a bunch of others.

The problem with Fairphone is that they have rather high demands (e.g. long term support for hardware, better production practices) but they are a rather small outfit, so the default answer from parts manufacturers is "talk to the hand".

As they grow they'll become more interesting

I would argue that Fairphone with /e/OS is a combination of a committed/sustainable manufacturer with a trustworthy OS. It does not actively spy or screw with you, and it tries to prevent snooping in many places.

Of course it's not nearly as security hardened as GrapheneOS, so that may be an unacceptable compromise to some.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] detren@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think they just released the fair phone 6 not too long ago so it’ll take a while even if it’s on the tables.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like a good choice. Motorola has some very good budget phones and also good high-end phones. All running pretty clean versions of Android. I hope GrapheneOS will support both a flagship (or midrange) and a budget phone.

[–] batmaniam@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

This is hilarious to me because other than a Samsung once (which made me go back) I had only moto... Until when I finally upgraded I wanted grapheneOS so pixel it was. Very happy about this.

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You know, I’d love a razr flip with graphene. Bring it on.

[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Ooo I'm sure this is likely for future models, but I was actually pondering getting a cheap pixel to try out graphene and see what it'd be like compared to my Razr. Maybe I'll have to wait a bit to see how this develops.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago

The best thing about Motorola is that they ship with a very stock android ROM. It's also the worst bit, because there's nobody maintaining any software. Handballing software maintenance to GrapheneOS would be sweet.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

why in the thumbnail is it neither org's logos?

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Interesting catch, weird AI image maybe?

[–] Fijxu@programming.dev 30 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I Fucking love Motorola, I'm cumming as I'm reading this. Thank you Motorola.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

The new phone is going to be called the Motorola Jizzr

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JoeMontayna@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is how a functioning capitalist system should work. Companies competing against each other for the benefit of the consumer.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

The purpose of a system is what it does. Capitalism is functioning, it's just that we're not the beneficiaries.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's great to see a mainstream OEM work with GOS. I really hope Motorola will make phones with an actual headphone jack. That's my no. 1 complaint about modern Pixel hardware.

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

they still do have jacks in some of their low and mid devices

[–] lumettaria@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Man I can't WAIT. Next up: Fairphone

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

lineage already works on those

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If Motorola is willing to have a non-shitty operating system, why can't they just put a non-shitty operating system on at the factory? All the stock Android OS I've seen lately, including Motorola's, are crappy, have privacy settings disabled, and in many cases are full of unremovable malware.

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Well, Google wants to continue their trend of spyware and people don't give enough shits for anything to change. Same as with smartphone manufacturers removing features (SD cards, removable battery) and car manufacturers adding spyware and unnecessarily complexifying cars to make them less sustainable.

Presumably they could start shipping graphene stock

load more comments (2 replies)

Yeah this is cool. Could have been much worse than Motorola. Looking forward to this

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

Haven't had a Motorola in many years. Hopefully this works out well and we get a really nice piece of hardware that isn't subject to the whims of Google.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

MWC 2026 announcement likely, but devices may not ship until 2027

Motorola is expected to formally announce the partnership [in March]. With MWC 2026 around the corner, the timing would make strategic sense.

In case others were wondering, MWC 2026 is March 2-5. So, hopefully we'll have official verification by the end of the week.

[–] Smif_N_Lenin@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

Really hope it releases 2026 so I can get rid of this pixel asap

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

According to the article, it was a little obvious that it'd be Motorola. To me it's unexpected as I wasn't following this all that closely. In any case, I'm personally pleased with the OEM choice. I'll need to do some research on Motorola's smartphones to prepare for the one/s that support Graphene.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They are basically stock android with minimal bloatware for a decent price. I've been using them for years. There's the whole Lenovo scandal but its hard to find any decent phone I want nowadays so concessions need to be made somewhere

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MIXEDUNIVERS@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i would liked xiomi more but more Hardware is better than only google

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schema@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I remember having a motorola razr when i was younger. Loved the design

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blazingamr@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Motorola had made several classic phones.I hope this will be their true comeback.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TiredTiger@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

Glad to see this. Motorola seemed like a solid choice. Hopefully we'll get some specs and release dates when they officially unveil it. I know it was pushed back to 2027, so I'm hoping for a Q1 2027 release. I've been holding off on getting a pixel in the hopes of getting a non-Google GrapheneOS phone. It would be nice if I don't wind up having to wait too much longer.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Tbh, not a huge fan of the pick. I had various Motorola Droid phones for years before switching to Samsung. All of the Droids were horribly underpowered after 2 years and the batteries only had 1/2 of their original capacity by that point. Then I got a Samsung S10e and it lasted 5+ years.

I seriously hope Motorola has gotten rid of their planned obsolescence policy in the past few years. It's nice that there's going to be a second vendor option for GrapheneOS soon, but I wish it was a better vendor

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

what would you consider a better vendor? samsung, xiaomi, oneplus? those all have been plenting more and more malware into their phones from the factory, sometimes making it seem like a feature, and recently they started to bar owners from replacing the OS on it by taking away the option to unlock the bootloader

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›