this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

6291 readers
566 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung and the State of Texas have reached a settlement agreement over the alleged unlawful collection of content-viewing information through its smart TVs

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 18 points 1 day ago

But definitely keep doing it everywhere else.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

What’s funny to me is instead of making a law all manufacturers would need to agree to, they “reached a deal with Samsung.” This is Texas power grid energy

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Queue massive splash screen with a wall of text and an "accept" or "decline" button.

If you press "decline" no online services function.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only they'd make it that easy

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Finding a non smart TV is it's own chore

[–] durindana@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Just block that mfer at the router

[–] jankforlife@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago

"It's just the data we need to protect our business. It's legitimate interest, I promise"

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm really curious if there is a planned review of Samsung's changes here. It seems awfully easy to change the TOS and claim changes were made while just continuing business as usual (yes, this is contradictory to the court order, but would it matter?). Samsung likely has already calculated how much money it would cost to do it that way (i.e. probable costs of fines, if caught) in comparison with how much money the whole endeavor takes in.

They could have barred Samsung from selling TVs in the state until a third party reviewer signs off on their changes. But that would mean handing an actual consequence to a corporation, and of all states, it's definitely not happening in Texas.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

You mean "stop telling them about collecting data".

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

Actually very rare Texas W

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Oh we're sorry to have so many photos of you having sex. We won't tell you anymore.