this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

General Discussion

14310 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Was just watching a show, and terrorists demanded a very well off country that they pay a STAGGERING sum of £100,000,000.

The government had an hour to do it OR ELSE.

Just thinking about the fact that their decision is based off of lives lost, and how little money that is to them, let alone the most rich, and how real of a situation is just disgusting.

Just wanted to vent this out and maybe talk about other shit. What do we have?

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not negotiating with kidnappers is a game-theory decision. It's not about whether the ransom is a lot of money or not - it's about what it incentivizes. If you pay, you're sending a clear signal that there's money to be made from kidnappings, and you're going to see more of them. If you refuse to pay, yeah, you risk the current hostages dying, but you're way less likely to face the same situation again - because anyone thinking about grabbing someone for ransom knows you didn't pay the last guy who tried it either.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

I get that, but this isn't a novel situation.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

It's not that much of a stretch.

In 1974, scions of the Bunge y Born business, were kidnapped and only released after the payment of a $60 million ransom.

https://www.nytimes.com/1975/06/21/archives/argentine-ransom-is-put-at-60million.html

In 1996, Victor Li Tzar-kuoi, son of the Hong Kong tycoon, Li Ka Shing: Kidnapped by Cheung Chi Keung, AKA "Big Spender". He was released after the world record payment of a HK$1,000,000,000 (US$134,000,000) ransom.

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1368203/kidnapper-asked-me-financial-advice-says-tycoon-li-ka-shing

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Grenades. You can just toss one a few feet away in movies and be just fine.

In real life they have a kill radius of like 15m.

Also cars exploding because they're on fire. It's relatively difficult to get gasoline to explode.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

True, that and the giant fireball from the grenade

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fret not. They're going to run a £750,000,000 op to avoid paying the money and only get the 90% of people at risk killed, then fuck up, then pay them anyway. Comma be very afraid of immigrants and your neighbors. They did this.