this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9007 readers
429 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While TikTok operates in the United States under new ownership, Apple has deployed technical restrictions to block iOS users in the United States from downloading other apps made by the video platform’s Chinese parent organization ByteDance.

ByteDance owns a vast array of different apps spanning social media, entertainment, artificial intelligence, and other sectors. The leading one is Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, which has over 1 billion monthly active users. While most of those users reside in China, iPhone owners around the world have traditionally been able to download these apps from anywhere without using a VPN, as long as they have a valid App Store account registered in China.

That’s not true anymore. Starting in late January, iPhone users in the US with Chinese App Store accounts began reporting that they were encountering new obstacles when they tried to download apps developed by ByteDance. WIRED has confirmed that even with a valid Chinese App Store account, downloading or updating a ByteDance-owned Chinese app is blocked on Apple devices located in the United States.

Instead, a pop-up window appears that says, “This app is unavailable in the country or region you’re in.” The restriction appears to apply only to ByteDance-owned apps and not those developed by other Chinese companies.

Apple and ByteDance declined to comment. TikTok USDS Joint Venture (the new entity controlling TikTok’s US operations) didn’t respond to WIRED’s request for comment.

The timing and technical specifics suggest the restriction is related to the deal TikTok agreed to in January to divest Chinese ownership of its US operations. The agreement was the result of the so-called TikTok ban law passed by Congress in 2024, which also barred companies like Apple and Google from distributing other apps majority-owned by ByteDance. The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act states that no company can “distribute, maintain, or update” any app majority-controlled by ByteDance “within the land or maritime borders of the United States.”

The law was primarily aimed at TikTok, which has more than 100 million users in the US and had been the subject of years of debate in Washington over whether its Chinese ownership posed a national security risk. But ByteDance also has dozens of other apps that at some point were also removed from Apple’s and Google’s app stores in the US. Now it seems like the scope of impact has reached even more apps that are not technically designed for US audiences, such as Douyin, the AI chatbot Doubao, and the fiction reading platform Fanqie Novel.

WIRED collected dozens of user reports on Chinese social media from people either living in or traveling to the US who said they had been blocked from downloading or updating popular ByteDance-owned apps. These apps are also not available on the Google Play Store, but it’s less of a concern for Android users as their devices have fewer restrictions on downloading apps from non-Google sources.

Traditionally, the primary way Apple enforced geographic restrictions on iPhone apps was according to the country where a user registered their Apple ID. To have an Apple account registered in, say, China, a person would typically need to have a phone number, payment method, and billing address in China. But once their account was registered, they could download apps designed for the Chinese market regardless of where they traveled.

In recent years, however, Apple has been developing more sophisticated mechanisms to identify where an App Store user is physically located. In 2023, the tech outlet 9to5Mac reported that Apple devices had created a new system called “countryd” to precisely determine a person’s location based on “data such as current GPS location, country code from the Wi-Fi router, and information obtained from the SIM card.”

Observers theorized that the new system was created in response to the European Union’s Digital Markets Act, which went into effect in 2024 and required Apple to begin allowing people in the EU to download apps from third-party app marketplaces. Apple complied with the EU regulation, but it restricted the accessibility of alternative app stores only to people physically in the territory of the EU.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

And they'll still claim the Great Firewall of China is a human rights violation even as they set up the Great Firewall of the US.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That’s not how it works. The way it works is, What are we, a bunch of Asians?

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago

Now we can't have people finding out whats actually happening in Iran can we now?

[–] finickydesert_1@social.vivaldi.net 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Censorship is fast approaching

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We're now clearly seeing that the whole narrative of liberalism being a more free society was pure nonsense all along. The only reason there hasn't been much censorship in the west before was due to the fact that mainstream liberal narrative was dominant. When majority of people willingly believed it, there was no need to do policing at state level. In fact, people would effectively police themselves, we still see this happening all the time today. Liberals will generally refuse to read news from sources outside of mainstream media, and automatically dismiss any information that comes outside their usual information bubble. This has been particularly prominent with the conflict in Ukraine, where despite all the predictions in western mainstream consistently being wrong, people would continue to cling to the narrative. Meanwhile, people with different views and perspectives would generally choose not to voice them for fear of being ostracized from polite company, having their social status affected, or having their careers ruined. Those who would dare to question the system would be pushed to the fringes. Dissident academics such as Michael Parenti would find it difficult to keep positions in universities, get tenure, or get published. And so, the west ended up with a greatest propaganda narrative about freedom of speech and right to expression.

But now that the mainstream is shrinking. More and more people falling due to decline in their material conditions, and non western media is becoming increasingly easy to access. Chinese media is now penetrating into the US exposing people to completely different perspectives. All of a sudden there's a need for censorship to keep the official narrative going. Now that the media advantage is fading, and people are increasingly starting to question things, the system of self policing is no longer sufficient to keep people in line.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

It feels like rednote is helping; people report posts w easily verifiable Western misinformation and rednote mods respond refusal, if they respond at all.