HiddenLayer555

What happens when you run out of fuel? Unless you plan on making the generators nuclear or something, I suppose you could still use renewables on the surface but then it definitely won't be a war bunker, just ecological/climate disaster bunker. I have a feeling war will take us out faster than ecological/climate catastrophe at this point.

IDK how Jews feel but if someone said calling out war crimes and genocide as anti- my culture/ethnicity, I'd be livid.

On certain vehicles, the wiring for the third-row left-hand (driver’s side) seat belt buckle could become damaged when the buckle is pulled. As a result, the seat belt status indicator in the instrument panel may incorrectly show that a seat belt is buckled when it’s not.

Honestly how did they design it such that a damaged (I assume disconnected?) connection can falsely register as a valid signal in a safety critical system? Betting it's a cost thing.

Also thanks for posting this

Plutoniumfish

"2030? So still a long time awa-holy shit that's four years from now"

I feel old

If I was Iran, I'd close the strait to US/Western traffic FOREVER. Something something don't negotiate with terrorists. And threaten to cut off any country that sells oil to the West, you know, like they're doing with Cuba. Then again I'm definitely not qualified nor have the desire to lead any country, let alone Iran.

Wow, not immediately cashing in on a global crisis to make yourself as rich as possible? Sounds like woke beta commie shit to me.

Feel bad for the metals and petrochemicals that were defiled into that murder machine.

Lol the capitalist countries who have their own oil, like Canada, might as well not have it as far as their citizens are concerned because the prices are still skyrocketing.

"Hey don't blame us, that's just the market price now. What are we supposed to do? Not cash in on the global resource crisis?"

I concede that there are some problematic takes in that thread, but they also don't seem to me like actionable threats or anything that could conceivably incite real world acts. I just see people who are angry at the current events venting their anger with little prior thinking through of the full implications. Not defending that, but... actually I tried to opine further but I feel I'm not knowledgable enough to talk about this, I personally wouldn't make those comments so I haven't really thought about justifying nor condemning people who do.

Got references you can point to? Most of the threads I read specifically want them to face justice for their crimes. Which is part of human rights. Getting the death penalty after being found guilty of participating in literal genocide is more than fair and doesn't violate human rights.

Also, people say hyperbolic shit when they're angry. And this war has understandably made a lot of people extremely angry. Not defending them if they really are calling for taking away human rights, but those people won't be the actual ones deciding or even influencing what happens to anyone after the war so your tone policing is not doing much to help.