Selfhosted

I'd run for the hills

There are so many issues with AI

This doesn't make me uneasy. It makes me resentful, a little angry, and a lot tired. Thanks for bringing it to attention, I will make sure that nothing of that project or from that author will ever cross my ecosystem again.

"but reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks by me. I created comparison documents, went through all queries multiple times and reviewed the logic over and over again. I also did load tests and manual regression tests, which took lots of evenings."

This is the way.

I can see the pragmatic appeal. Maintaining a lot of code for an open source project is thankless. Go is designed for idiots like me so it makes sense that an llm should be able to emit code that mostly works. There are classes of errors that are less likely in Go and the compiler and linting will prevent some foot guns and then it would have been tested.

Ethically I hate anything to do with the llm industry and all it represents. I hate the environmental impacts. The social impacts. The disregard for intellectual property. The devaluing of human effort. The scam economics. I won't use anything touched by it on principle and if that means walking away from a dead Internet so be it. There is enough pre-2020s books, audiobooks, movies, music and code to keep me interested for the rest of my life.

I'm so tired of that.

I'm using it for scripts notifications + unifiedpush. I don't know where to start to find the fitting alternative.

ts getting you pinned to 2.17 in the compose file 🥹🤞🥀

Sigh. Time to switch to gotify

It looks like that tool is more or less built by a single developer (you already trust their judgment anyways!), and even though the code came through in a single PR it was a merge from a branch that had 79 separate commits: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/pull/1619

Also glancing through it a bit, huge portions of that are straightforward refactors or even just formatting changes caused by adding a new backend option.

I'm not going to say it's fine, but they didn't just throw Claude at a problem and let it rewrite 25k lines of code unnecessarily.

we're all so fucked

I'm a developer

I sometimes sometimes use AI for an answer to a complicated problem because normally I'd open up 20 pages , have to go through them all to find the right answer

AI gets me the answer right away, though it likely is completely wrong or at least partially wrong. Either way, it gives me a general direction and with that I only have to search through one or two pages to confirm, so the same process is just a little faster.

I laso have used AI on a couple of occasions to ask it to write code for a complicated problem. Again, you don't copy the code, god no, it's always the worst, and it is in 80% of the cases still at least riddled with bugs, or just complete bullshit. However, it might give me an alternative idea or a direction to take to implement or fix this complicated feature problem.

That's the extent to which I've used AI and for the foreseeable future that won't change because AI still can't code. It's still wildly flailing around and it might produce something that implements a certain functionality, but it's a guarantee that that functionality will have more bugs and security holes than features

@ueiqkkwhuwjw just this quote at the start of the release notes

> 14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed, all from one pull request

This is already a major red flag even without the ai stuff right? Can't believe anyone would flaunt that like this.

They are not even trusting it themselves. This is from the release notes

I'll not instantly switch ntfy.sh over. Instead, I'm kindly asking the community to test the Postgres support and report back to me if things are working

Fuck that.