this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
473 points (98.6% liked)

World News

54730 readers
2729 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An eerie quiet hangs over Ras Al Khaimah’s industrial port. Usually a thriving maritime hub of the United Arab Emirates, now ships stand docked and silent. Not far out along the hazy horizon, a backlog of hundreds of tankers have lined up in recent days, halted along a waterway flooded with danger.

Any vessel heading past Ras Al Khaimah out to the Arabian Sea must traverse the world’s most treacherous strip of water for shipping today: the strait of Hormuz. Just over 20 nautical miles from Ras Al Khaimah, two oil tankers heading for the strait were attacked by Iranian missiles this week, one catching fire.

It is one of the many consequences facing Gulf states as they are pulled deeper into a war that they did not start and had diplomatically tried to prevent.

For decades, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Oman have allowed US military bases, infrastructure or access on their soil, and have been among the largest buyers of American weapons and technology. In return, the US has stood as the Gulf’s closest and most significant military partner and protector.

But now, Gulf states have growing concerns over the relationship, analysts say, after Donald Trump was seen to wilfully torpedo peaceful diplomatic negotiations in favour of starting a war in the Middle East.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The Gulf states and the Saudis didn't start the war, but they have long been lobbying for an attack on Iran. They just didn't want their military personnel in the line of fire. They're either useless or, in the case of Saudi, too busy committing genocide against Yemenis.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Also in the case of the Saudis also useless. I think the only competent Arab states are Oman and Jordan. As I understand it Yemen is too fractured to really be counted one way or another, even I am tempted to add them to the list.

[–] Bonifratz@piefed.zip 12 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I think Trump's best course of action is to take the loss, pull out and try to sell it as a "mission accomplished" at home, which might just work for the redhats.

Then he still has to hope that the mullahs take the win and leave it at that, not trying to avenge the old Khameini any further.

And he still has to hope that he hasn't permanently damaged the alliances with the Gulf states.

And he still has to hope that the economic chaos he's started doesn't escalate and it doesn't take too long to return to normal.

Etc.

I.e. the US is very likely fucked in the long term. But all other options seem even worse.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

He'll probably just start nuking Iran instead.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Hmm. Maybe he can put a tariff on Iran? Or maybe build a wall around it?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago

And he still has to hope that he hasn’t permanently damaged the alliances with the Gulf states.

And he still has to hope that the economic chaos he’s started doesn’t escalate and it doesn’t take too long to return to normal.

Unless those were his marching orders in the first place. Trump is a chaos agent, and he uses the disorder he causes to commit more acts of corruption and more power grabs. Every self-created crisis is a pretext to commit the next crime.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 66 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Those countries have been directly funding Donald Trump and are all littered with American bases. They are absolutely involved.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 8 points 19 hours ago

I met several US Navy servicemen when I was living there.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 35 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who grew up in Dubai I want to tell them to go fuck themselves. They made their bed, now sleep on it.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'd submit their beds were made using slaves.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 8 points 16 hours ago

And I hope they require a cloud connection and it is severed, meaning they will overheat and their angle will be uncomfortable.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 41 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I hate to say this but as a former US military officer I am 100% behind Iran. The Mango Mussolini started Operation Epstein Fury as a distraction and the buzzards need to come home to roost. I am sorry people are getting killed but Iran is not going to stop now that their leader and 180 little girls have been killed.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 hour ago

These "Epstein Files" are just a distraction from the real intent of what's going on over there.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Protection for Petro dollar oil dies here. Trump is destroying American dominance on the world stage, it's wild to see.

Petro dollar is worthless.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

It's been replaced with the pedo dollar, do try to keep up.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe stop allowing America to use your country as bases to terrorize and control your neighbors?

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

They fucking love America. How do you think they can move $100 million cargo ships full of oil around on a daily basis!

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

You were talking about a bunch of dictatorships that use their Neighbor slave labor to suck oil out of the ground and concentrate trillions of dollars in the hands of a few people

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago

Seriously tho 🤣 Iran bombed the fuck out of them and now they can’t sell oil. Sorry I can’t find my compassion for the petrostate dictators. May they lose all their ill gotten gains.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Let me cry crocodile tears and play the worlds smallest violin for the poor lil ole petrol states

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Australia needs to cancel our leases of American bases in Australia. Even if you think we should be aligned with the US only having Australian bases on Australian soil is in our best interests. This war has shown that any host country of American bases will be subject to attacks not only on those bases but on the host country's own military and civilian infrastructure.

Yanks out!

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Let's not forget the last prime minister who tried that was Whitlam, and what then happened to him is no coincidence. The CIA reaches far and wide unfortunately.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That doesn't mean we shouldn't try it again. Unironically who would they even put in charge if they were to try it today. Labors position now is unassailable compared to what it was in whitlams time. A snap election right now would just be a labor victory, probably greater than the one it just had, the total annihilation of the coalition and the ascendence of one nation to opposition status before it immediately implodes along with the liberals and nationals.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 96 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So the middle east countries paid top dollar to get the US 'president' to do all the things they wanted, and he ended up screwing every single one of them. When you get in bed with trump, he will eventually shit the bed, and you will have to lie in it with him. You deserve the stupid choice you made.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 49 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 10 points 20 hours ago

Rules for Being an Evil Overlord, #22: "No matter how tempted I am with the prospect of unlimited power, I will not consume any energy field bigger than my head."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 121 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (48 children)

The reason that every other US president has ruled out war with Iran is exactly because of this tactic. It takes a group of really ignorant, egotistical, and foolhardy leaders to melt through the layers of decision making that underlie such a course of action.

The more Trump screams on social media and Hegseth bully pulpits while whining about media coverage, the worse this war is going. Look for more avoidable Air Force and Navy incidents, more dead American soldiers, and a civilian bloodbath that will take decades to unravel the implications of.

load more comments (48 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Every single one of you were buddy buddy with Trump to America's detriment. I don't give a single shit what happens to you.

load more comments
view more: next ›