this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
48 points (100.0% liked)

Television

1897 readers
495 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

spoiler
When Pluribus creator Vince Gilligan and his writers room decided to give Carol Sturka (Rhea Seehorn) her very own nuclear bomb at the end of Season One, they were pretty sure they had a plan for it. “We thought we knew what we were gonna do,” said Gilligan, sitting down with Seehorn for an interview last week at the Rolling Stone Studio, live at SXSW. “And then you get into it and you’re like: Do we? Do we really know?”

He joked that the show might just never mention the weapon again, and Seehorn played along: “Leave the box sitting in the driveway,” she said.

“People forget,” Gilligan added, with a laugh. (See the whole interview on Rolling Stone’s YouTube channel or press play above.)

Gilligan is also uncertain about when the world might see Season Two. The writers room has been at it for months, he told us, with less progress than he’d like. He suggested that a previously floated late-2027 schedule probably isn’t realistic, while admitting to some jealousy over The Pitt’s production pace. “They’re kicking our butts in every award show,” he said. “They managed to make a great show and bring it in one year later, on the day, for the new season.… How frigging long is this gonna take? I don’t know. We’re doing our best. It takes forever, making this thing. I wish it was faster. We appreciate everybody’s patience very much, more and more as the months drag on. But thank you, anyone who likes the show. We are honest to God doing our best.”

Pluribus became Apple TV’s biggest drama launch in November 2025, and Seehorn won both the Golden Globe and Critics Choice Award for her performance, which often finds her alone onscreen for multiple scenes per episode. For Seehorn, being in nearly every frame took its toll. “It was a marathon,” she said. “I was keenly aware that if I got sick, there’s nothing to shoot. I’m only not in, like, five seconds of this thing.”

But she emphasized that even in scenes where she’s the only person on screen, she’s not really alone. “I’m doing a dance with about 250 crew members that believe in the story,” she said. “It’s a dance with the camera. It’s a dance with the lights. It’s a dance with sound.… It’s only gonna be better if I am doing it with everybody and everybody’s contributing their best work. You’re only messing up if you ever are thinking, ‘It’s all about me.’”

She recalled a moment near the end of five weeks of night shoots, when she was steeling herself for another take and a camera assistant named Jules tapped her on the ankle: “The sun’s coming up and we’re chasing darkness, not chasing light. And he just said, ‘You know we all got you, right?’ And it meant the world to me. And they do. And I got them.”

Gilligan is doing his best to relish his ongoing writers room struggles. “I want it to get easy, but it never does,” he said. “And in my heart of hearts, I know that if it ever did get easy, that’s when it’s time to call it a day. That’s the time to retire. Because if it ever got easy, it wouldn’t mean that I had mastered it. It would mean that I was at that point a hack and I was phoning it in. Because if you’re doing it right, it’s never gonna get easy.”

Seehorn nodded. “I feel the same. If I’m ever not terrified, I’m like, ‘What? What?’”

Gilligan is emphatic that Pluribus is not a mystery-box show, and that fans expecting a grand reveal should temper their expectations. “If you’re waiting for everyone to pull their faces off and magically it’ll be reptilian evil, don’t hold your breath,” he said. “You might already know everything you need to know.” Then, taking it one step further: “If you’re really into mystery-box shows, watch something else other than Pluribus.”

Gilligan traces his aversion to the form back to his seven years on The X-Files, which he calls the second-greatest job he’ll ever have. “If The X-Files taught me anything, it was to assiduously avoid mystery-box shows,” he says. “You can do a mystery-box movie. It’s damn hard to do a mystery-box TV show.” The problem, as he explains it, is that open-ended series inevitably pile mystery on top of mystery. “With The X-Files, you got the bees and then you got the oil and you got the super soldiers. Every open-ended series falls prey to it.”

Seehorn offered her own take on what Pluribus is really about. “It’s not a mystery as in, ‘I can’t wait to find out the evil power behind it,’” she said. “The questions it’s raising are more about what it means to be human.” Her character, she noted, is obsessed with stopping the alien threat, but the real drama is internal. “She’s wrestling with questions that are much larger about human nature while she thinks she’s going after the plot.”

Gilligan points to a key difference between Pluribus and other shows about humanity under siege. “I love The Walking Dead. I love The Last of Us,” he said. “Those are shows in which it’s a very binary proposition. You’re either a human or you’re a zombie or a mushroom person. And you don’t wanna be either of those things. There’s nobody who ever wants to be a zombie. But on this show, it’s a legitimate question. Maybe you’d be better off being happy. Maybe you’d be better off being one of ‘them.’ That, to me, is always an important element of this.”

The pair also address Quentin Tarantino‘s recent claim on The Joe Rogan Experience that TV shows don’t stick with you the way movies do. “Firmly disagree,” Seehorn said. “There’s forgettable films, just like there’s forgettable television, and then there’s ones that stick with you. I’m still thinking about The Leftovers. I’m still thinking about Six Feet Under.”

Gilligan agrees. “I’m still thinking about Twilight Zone,” he said. “I’m still thinking about The Andy Griffith Show. I’m still thinking about MAS*H. I’m still thinking about WKRP in Cincinnati. I could go on and on. I don’t know Quentin Tarantino. I met him once for 10 seconds. But I bet he’s telling the truth for him. He’s such a film aficionado. But it’s probably a little overly generalized.”

Gilligan also shared his concerns about the state of the industry. “I worry about AI,” he says. “I worry about one company owning everything.” But he’s hopeful that human creativity will win out. “People care about people. Every story you’ve ever been enamored of, whether it’s science fiction or a horror movie, all the best stories are about people. At the end of the day, people want authenticity. They want truth. They want real human emotion. That’s why I continue to have hope. People are never gonna get tired of storytelling, and humans tell stories, not machines.”

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

It's not the headline I wanted to read, but at the moment I'm willing to give Vince Gillian A LOT of freedom to figure it out.

Breaking Bad was all about writing themselves into corners and figuring out how to write themselves out. Was that show the exception or the rule? We'll find out.

[–] marighost@piefed.social 18 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Edit: OP put the entire paywalled article in the post under a spoiler tag, because they're excellent.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I put it in the description under spoiler code.

[–] marighost@piefed.social 6 points 16 hours ago

🤦

I'm blind, apparently. Thanks.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

Not paywalled for me (either my ad blocker is that good, or you get so many free articles before it asks for money), but I agree OP is awesome for posting the whole article.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well, that's disappointing. I enjoyed the first season, but the fact that he has no plan doesn't sound good for future episodes.

[–] lemming@anarchist.nexus 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair he had no plan before he wrote season 1 either, and look how that turned out.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Slow? Plodding? Lots of filler shots to pad out the season?

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If you think that was all filler, then we must have watched different shows

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure I watched “Pluribus”. Not sure what you were watching.

https://kevinmathews.substack.com/p/pluribus-just-hit-the-wall-why-the

“But there is a fine line between portraying aimlessness and actually being aimless as a storyteller. Pluribus crossed that line this week. Nothing pushed the story forward. We didn’t learn anything new about Carol’s internal state that we couldn’t have gleaned from a five-minute sequence. Instead, we got forty minutes of wandering that felt less like character development and more like the writers needing to stretch the runtime before the finale.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2025/12/24/pluribus-season-1-finale-review/

“My frustration with Pluribus stems largely from two major problems. First, the pacing and repetitiveness. Second, the stretched-thin plot. This show’s story is like too little butter spread over too much bread.”

[–] MrQuallzin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's fine if that's your opinion. Slow pacing isn't for everyone. I fully enjoyed being forced to experience the loneliness and emptyness that Carol was experiencing. It makes later interactions that she has more meaningful and helps us process how her mind is working.

[–] Xraygoggles@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I think you make a good point but the pace is slower than necessary to achieve these artistic benefits. It's an overall detriment to the show when you keep squeezing a method that has no juice left. Emotional impact received, then sank in, then 20 more minutes on top? A bit too far I think. Narrative devices have diminishing returns, they pushed it so far that it looks like incompetence.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 6 points 13 hours ago

Was debating if I should watch this. Not gonna now.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I refused to watch the show after seeing the teasers/trailers. Show looked dumb. The reactions people have had online show me I was wrong. I subscribe to Apple TV. I plan on watching it at some point. I don't know who Seehorn is, but I vaguely trust Vince Gilligan. I didn't love Breaking Bad like some people, but I did enjoy it.

I like what he's saying about it not being a mystery box show. That was what I was thinking it was. Everyone thinks that about Severance, an Apple TV show I am very familiar with (as a fan, I don't work on it). And that show sells itself as a mystery box, but it's not. It's not nearly as smart as people think it is. It's workplace satire, just like The Office. Only, it's dark. And it has elements of sci-fi. And it takes place in a world that is not our own... okay. But it's still just workplace satire. It's not that deep. It's a bunch of euphemisms, allegories, whatever, I'm not sure which of those things it is, but it's one of those. People are looking for answers to questions about the world, and maybe they'll be answered, but they aren't the point.

It's like how Nintendo will never tell you who nuked who in Animal Crossing. That's right — if you weren't aware, Nintendo's cute animal village franchise takes place in a post-nuclear world. I'm not even sure Nintendo knows who nuked who, or if that was even the original idea. They just put a couple NPCs in who imply things like how you're the last human, stuff like that... and let fans just go wild with theories. There are a ton of them out there. Most of them agree that something happened to all the humans. But the game will never tell you what. Even if you get all the rare dialogue and meet all the NPCs who talk about it, the game just kinda... keeps going. None of the NPCs care that you know. Nothing's changed. You still catch bugs and fish and collect useless shit for your house. But you can't leave because there's nowhere for you to go. And they're probably never, ever going to elaborate.

Sometimes you don't get all the answers. But thinking about the answers spurs creativity in some people, it inspires others to create. And that's beautiful.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 10 points 14 hours ago

Rhea Seehorn played Kim Wexler in Better Call Saul. Incredibly well-written character, played wonderfully by Seehorn. She's top notch.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

I got a couple eps and couldn't bring myself to care. Knowing that he had no long term plans for the show only go to solidify my thoughts on what I saw.

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is something my friends and I had a lengthy discussion about. Considering the extraterrestrial nature of the origin of the mind virus, Carol realistically should just

Tap for spoilereat it

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago

I can imagine the nuke

spoilerexists as a threat, or as a failsafe for when they finish how to infect her. Detonate it when they get too close, or something.