A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
I can see them flying in and the US/Isrealshooting them down even if they arrange it beforehand.
They'll wait until it's bombed flat, then kill some civilians.
Is Saudi Arabia allowing strikes from bases on their soil into Iran? If not, then from a legal/moral point of view Saudi Arabia is completely in the right, since Iran has attacked Saudi Arabia first.
Yes their airspace and US military bases are used for offensive attacks on Iran. These US puppet state monarchries are neutered.
Switzerland, Spain, Japan, even France those are christians and athiests they stood up to Trump and decalred they will not allow the US to use their airports, military bases or even airspace for attacks on Iran.
These neutered gulf dictatorships meanwhile only have the power to jail and torture their citizens and stay in power licking Trump boots even after paying him trillions in investments, bribes and board of peace memberships and in "defence" contracts
This 1-yr old video goes over few of their coorporations with Israel during the Gaza genocide:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Heo6QxpGWyQ
On top of Saudi delivering bombs to Israel through Italy's port, and the UAE pilots parricipating in bombing gaza themselves. Look both up using any search engine. They were aiding gaza genocide. How far do you expect them to spread their legs now?
Yes their airspace and US military bases are used for offensive attacks on Iran.
Source?
please use Google before you ask:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/us-f-35-aircraft-makes-210122616.html
"The US has yet to confirm why the F-35 was forced to make an emergency landing.
Since fighting began on February 28, the United States has reportedly lost approximately 12 MQ-9 Reaper drones.
Separately, US officials said five KC-135 refuelling aircraft were damaged in an Iranian missile strike at a base in Saudi Arabia, although the reports have not been independently verified."
They bomb them, refuel then go back to bomb Iran again.
On top of the reports that this war was drummed up by Netenyahu and Saudi leaders from the start. On top of the F15s that fly from Ali Salouem base in Kuwait btw there are videos of Land-to-Land Himar and PCOM missiles firing from UAE and Bahrain too.
I dont have time to go search for them now. you can easily search online yourself.
Also I wish you watch this whole video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Heo6QxpGWyQ
That stance makes absolutely no sense. If a nation is invading you the military bases belonging to that nation are valid legal targets.
"Oh but don't worry these bases aren't being used to attack you, they just hold a bunch of personnel and equipment that we can easily move to use against you, but you're definently not allowed to attack those"
Of course to get to those they must also trespass in Saudi Arabia's airspace which then justifies Saudi Arabia retaliating against Iran. War is messy like that
That stance makes absolutely no sense. If a nation is invading you the military bases belonging to that nation are valid legal targets.
Well yes and not - but that is how international law works. As an analogy, Russia is not attacking tanks heading through the EU to Ukraine, before they pass the border into Ukraine.
There has to be a consensus of what constitutes a legal target. Or the whole world would be anarchy.
That is absolutely a legal target for Russia too. It would also be suicidal and trigger article 5 of NATO.
Just because something is not a war crime to do doesn't make it a smart thing to do.
That is absolutely a legal target for Russia too. I
Not according to international law, as I understand it.
I mean they are all evidence suggests it but even if not directly attack from the bases in their country they are allowing the us to run radar and electronic warfare and refueling and on and on no even question about that.
Good content but that period needs friends. It's too much sentence for just one break.
radar and electronic warfare and refueling and on and on
NATO is sending radar intel to Ukraine too - is NATO waging war on Russia? By international law, I would say not.
Russia is also sending satellite into to Iran. Also not an act of war.
It seems quite important to me that there is a consensus on what constitutes an act of war. Otherwise everything becomes a potential act of war, no meaningful limits or red lines people know not to cross, with corresponding escalation risks.