this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

Australia

4912 readers
212 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Block — the company behind Square, Afterpay and Cash App.

Since it's not in the headline

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So if you say you are laying off employees as necessary for cost cutting. One of the problem with fake jobs is companies that are seeking employees are seen as healthy and growing so it looks better for them to be seeking them. Cutting looks bad. Right now though we have this gift to corps. Its a horrible global economy but if you say you are laying off because you can make it all up and more with ai then your stock won't just not fall but actually rise and you will be looked at as next gen smartz super good company. If its not clear I think many layoffs now is kinda being blamed on ai when that is not what its about at all.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Cutting looks bad.

unless you look at the stock price which nearly always goes up after job cuts are announced.

so to owners it looks good.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If its not clear I think many layoffs now is kinda being blamed on ai when that is not what its about at all.

Blaming AI makes AI sound like a legitimate technology. Silicon Valley had a good run, they took all the proven analog tools of society and digitized them, but once all that was done, there has been no real innovation in software other than enshittification with ads and subscriptions, which people are avoiding. There was a boom during lockdown but people are getting away from the garbage on social media..Facebook, X, ticktok, insta etc. is for losers. Typically all the same people.

In the long run AI will have as much impact on work as Google's original search engine, but that's it.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Blaming AI makes AI sound like a legitimate technology.

CBA got caught out, bunch of layoffs announced, stock price up, they say "because ai", turned out they just offshored the jobs to India.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/banking/commonwealth-bank-admits-jobs-were-offshored-to-india-after-283-redundancies/news-story/855cf33c0a63773afd0de91c92649292

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

nah it means blame something besides the company is doing poorly.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Writing code never has been and never will be the bottleneck. What we’re finding is that the actual bottlenecks come under a lot more pressure from all the code that is being produced.

Of course, in this case the actual operational capabilities are vastly less important than what the c-suite believes to be true, or at least what they want to protect to their shareholders.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

If people can't explain what they want their software to do to another person, how do they expect a regurgitation machine prone to hallucinations and trained on Stack Overflow questions to get it right?

[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Writing code never has been and never will be the bottleneck.

YES! I recently completed two code-heavy projects at work. My bosses kept asking me if I could use more AI to get the project done faster... and I kept telling them no! The bottleneck wasn't my typing speed. The bottleneck was me thinking through the design, thinking about edge cases, running experiments to validate hypothesis, testing out different API designs.

Typing out the code took like 1 day out of the 2 weeks. Code generation is not the bottleneck.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

OK, this is a general thought that I'd had many years ago, and doesn't necessarily relate to this article specifically, but I thought I'd mention it.

One of the trickier things to do is cut your workforce. In a lot of cases what you want to do and what you legally may be able to do are not be the same thing. Often you need a plausible rationale to do so.

Arguably, AI provides that plausible rationale.

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also cuts costs without spooking investors.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly, makes a company in decline sound CUTTING EDGE.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

AI is absolutely being used as a pretext to cut jobs. They'll axe 1000, say "oh whoops that was a mistake" and hire 500 back.