123
No offense, but this sounds like a gimmick. Most bookstores stock banned books
It was opened by a children's author whose books were banned and she wanted kids to have access to her books and other banned books and let them know that people don't want them to read them.
That doesn't sound like a gimmick to me, but...
I get his point. I've seen Barnes and Noble feature banned books at the front of their store. It's a good thing to have available, but it's pretty standard for book stores to have banned books.
Barnes and Noble has a mystery lit section and there are still bookstores that specialize in mystery lit that do okay. I don't think that is necessarily a business ender.
I think the Colorado libraries feature banned books, too.
Every librarian fuckin loves showing off banned books. Most of my local libraries have a section, but it’s a liberal town
My locally owned bookstore has a display featuring banned books. It's not an entire store of banned books, but I think that's good. I don't think a store with only banned books would be viable in the long term.
Maybe not, but Leah Johnson is really serious about it and is putting a lot of her own proceeds from her books into it.
Magards are going to descend on this place like a swarm of overweight pink locusts. I feel bad for the cashier.
Groomer's Banned Books Store.
Now only let in customers with children in tow. /S
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
123 points (97.7% liked)
politics
18586 readers
4382 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS