this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
88 points (97.8% liked)

Risa

8108 readers
145 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] usernamefactory@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If they saw it before they were 14, it’s nuanced, insightful, even challenging. If they saw it after they were 14, it’s shallow insincere pandering.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 hour ago

Honestly sums it up. /r/im35andthisispandering

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 37 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)
[–] hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago

I love Dax. We need more Dax. And

spoiler___Tawny Newsome should really get to play her more than once.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I tried to work in a Pa'nar syndrome one but it was too clunky. I appreciate how you just slapped "HIV ALLEGORY" on it 😂

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Sometimes clunky problems require simple solutions lol. I couldn't figure out any other way to represent Pa'nar syndrome in a still.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 11 points 13 hours ago

Listen, you got the job done not to mention this meme is specifically about how nitpicking representation is harmful to representation.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

come now, us chuds don't count enterprise /s

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

ENT is definitely one of my top 3 Treks. Wasn't perfect, but I just really like the "everything is new and experimental" aspect of it. That, and the early episodes having to solve problems without relying on the transporters or having to hand-wave away why they can't use them.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I still think it's kinda funny that transporters were only written in because they couldn't afford a shuttle in TOS season 1 then they became so iconic. I wonder what trek would be like if they'd only ever had shuttles.

[–] IcedRaktajino@startrek.website 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder what trek would be like if they'd only ever had shuttles.

The Orville lol

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

hmmm who would shoot blue goo out of their forehead?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Barclay, probably.

[–] autonomous@lemmy.ml 29 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Racism they took head on more, but gender/sexuality they had to be more creative so as to keep berman and the execs from figuring it out.

Gender and sexuality have made leaps and bounds since then and episodes that deal with it similarly now are more likely to be broadcast. It's the same spirit as before, just catching up with the times.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 15 points 13 hours ago

And the one time they finally gave a single throwaway line to the fact that enbys exist, quote-unquote "progressives" suddenly clutch their pearls over it.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 4 points 10 hours ago (4 children)
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The most tasteful way I could include a non white human character directly referring to their non white culture as being a part of their identity while also tiptoeing around the fact that the specific culture being represented was... not real

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Hakuchimoya, these are words of my people or something.

Just Chakotay things.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 1 points 9 hours ago

not a damn clue tbh

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 1 points 9 hours ago

I was wondering that too

[–] lengau@midwest.social 8 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah this shit irritates me in part because I feel like Discovery has lazy writing, but it's hard to make those criticisms of it because as soon as you start people dismiss you as a shitlord because they assume you think it's that shit.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 7 points 10 hours ago

Agreed with the reaction to criticisms. My biggest problem with Discovery is the fact that, during the last two seasons especially, you'd frequently have some insanely huge event taking place that also has a ticking clock and the crew will just stop trying to solve the event so they can have a little talk about their feelings.

I have no problem with Star Trek talking about people's feelings. I have no problem with Burnham's arc effectively being about her seeing the value of her emotions (after having been raised by Vulcans). I have no problem with a Star Trek show having scenes of therapy or whatnot. I have huge problems with these things happening IN THE MIDDLE OF A TICKING CLOCK GALAXY WIDE CRISIS. You're supposed to be professionals. Get it together, finish the mission, then deal with all of this in debrief!

But some might read this and think that I'm "hur dur, Michael Burnham is crying all the time." Nope.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 15 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There are a lot of people out there who are "totally ok with the gays" but put such a high bar on what constituents acceptable representation that it starts to feel like bigotry by omission.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, I agree. That's the thing — I have no problem with whatever "woke" stuff people are complaining about. My complaints are things like "this is the first time anyone in Star Trek (outside of time travel) mentioned inches."

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

ok hey it's the guy from the meme

sorry the representation wasn't discussed precisely the way you wanted

also star trek has always been like that

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Except the representation is literally not what I have a problem with?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I understand, you like representation, you're happy it's there, you just believe it should only be talked about it extremely specific ways or not at all. That's what Patrick is doing in the first panel.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago

Wow it took me way too long to realise you were trolling...

My complaints are things like “this is the first time anyone in Star Trek (outside of time travel) mentioned inches.”

Why are you blaming Disco for something that TNG did?

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Is the last one where they go back in time and work at a newspaper?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Not time travel; Ben Sisko having a 'vision' of Benny Russel, science fiction writer.

Or maybe Benny Russell having a vision of Ben Sisko.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 1 points 5 hours ago

This is of course the correct answer. Everybody else being played by the DS9 cast is just a projection by Ben (or Benny) into his (or their?) fantasy.

[–] Vicinus@piefed.zip 15 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Not sure its a newspaper, seemed more a sci-fi monthly magazine, but yeah. Just watched it yesterday: Season 6 Episode 13 - Far Beyond the Stars

Edit: added a sentence to actually answer the question.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 5 points 14 hours ago

Nope they're just hanging at Quark's