this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
137 points (97.9% liked)

politics

29096 readers
2134 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., came out in opposition to the Senate deal on DHS on Friday, saying he wouldn’t put the bill on the floor. Many House Republicans privately think he’s making a mistake.

After a week of false starts toward ending the Department of Homeland Security shutdown, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., delivered the biggest setback yet on Friday, telling his conference that he wouldn’t bring the Senate deal, passed just hours earlier with unanimous support, to the House floor.

Behind closed doors, many House Republicans are already questioning the speaker’s decision.

On a GOP members-only conference call on Friday, Johnson came out in opposition to the Senate bill.

“We are not gonna eat the crap sandwich the Senate sent us,” Johnson told House Republicans, according to a source on the line.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Why don’t they boot his ass.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

During the private conference call with House Republicans, Johnson’s own members criticized the speaker’s plan, according to the source on the line who was granted anonymity to share the private discussions.

That's a real Profile in Courage right there.

"We're doing the wrong thing, but I will go along with it because I'm afraid to speak out publicly. I mean, you've seen the crazies who vote for me, right? One of them might pop me...."

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Speaking about courage, Ben Shapiro is now able to enlist thanks to the new cap on age limits. Just putting that out there.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 7 minutes ago

Ben Shapiro has a medical condition called “Cringe AF” that prevents him from serving.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 64 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Republican pussies could literally remove his ass from the speakership and have Trump impeached and removed from office lickity split, but they would rather privately grumble anonymously until they retire.

[–] ZombieChicken@reddthat.com 19 points 13 hours ago

Personally, I think the GOP is run entirely by a small cabal that dictates everything. If you go far enough in that org, someone has something on you to make you dance.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 6 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Pussy is not a insult. You scrotum.

[–] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago

I mean it is an insult, you can twist it like Betty White and not want it to be one but it is definitely an insult. Has been a very long time.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

In the immortal words of Betty White.

"I don't know why 'pussy' is used to mean someone who is weak. I've got one, and that thing can take a pounding!"

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

Please, "bawbag" is the polite term.

[–] DandomRude@piefed.social 9 points 17 hours ago

Well, they make a lot of money through corruption. So they have to put their ethics on the back burner sometimes. You have to understand that - they’re just trying to line their pockets as much as possible. Where would we end up if limits were placed on greed? Unthinkable!

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 36 points 20 hours ago

Welp, you fuckin' own that shit, assholes, unless you plan to do something about it. This is who you are.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

At this point I don’t give a shit. Anyone that sticks an R next to their name is complicit.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Nurses hate this.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago

So basically the House GOP have all turned into Susan fucking Collins. We are absolutely in the dumbest, worst, most embarrassing timeline.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 29 points 20 hours ago

Oh no! Not concerns! What ever will poor little Mikey do about some concerns??

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

There is not a single person in this system with meritocratic validity, aka not born into wealth. The societal level nepotism of inherited wealth is the cause of all present problems. It is the common thread through every problem name you know. Intelligence is not hereditary in humans, but wealth is. This is the case in every western country except Japan.

[–] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Carcetti was actually a decent mayor though, if I recall. He at least had good intentions, even though the system was broken.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Wire season 4 and 5 spoilersHe wanted to do good things, but when he found out the school system was in a massive amount of debt and that the only way to keep the city running without doing extreme austerity would have been to take a bail out from the state that would've hurt his campaign for governor, he did the extreme austerity and let the city suffer instead of sacrifice his personal ambitions