this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
487 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29112 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Much as I like this idea, it's not going to catch on. You think the average non-union retail or office worker will risk being fired? We are locked into the system we have, and sadly, that's that. Unless and until a plurality of workers lose the entire life they have.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Without existing strong organization you're probably right, but it's more likely that the wheels will come off and a general strike would happen naturally with rising inflation and unemployment.

The shitter things get, the less tight your social ties need to be for collective action. Everyone's implicitly on the same page when you start missing meals.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the average commuter will have to lose their house in the burbs (just 50 miles from work), the kid's private school, and the Tundra. When Frank Freeway is living in a rented shipping container and eating slop from the church food bank, MAYBE a few years of that will wake us the fuck up.

Me? I'm retired. I could lose everything any time.

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well you have to remember that Franks house is on an adjustable rate mortgage and his Tundra still has 80 months left on the loan. If the income gets cut, the rug gets pulled on everything and people wake up real quick.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Would be too late

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 12 points 8 hours ago

I hope this is the tip of the iceberg for what's to come.

Seize your country back!!

The first step is always the hardest after decades of oppression and misinformation!

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say which unions have signed onto this "General Strike." Do they even plan on involving the unions in this? -is it like last time when they said they were having a "General Strike" but it wasn't a real General Strike?

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

It's illegal for unions to coordinate a general strike. If they were signed on they would be pretty careful about it. That's why the UAW president was making waves by suggesting that everyone set their contracts to end on the same date.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

oh now we are talking. and it’s for more then one day and with a list of demands yes?

[–] OhioComrade@lemmy.ml 21 points 15 hours ago

I'm glad that after Minnesota general strikes are on the table again. Especially now that we're bringing May Day back.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 50 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

We need to shut it all down for weeks before they realize we’re serious. But to foster change we’d have to shut it down for months.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Bullshit

COVID killed the economy in a couple days

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's why a Government Shutdown makes much more sense. Europeans are always pushing us for a General Strike, but that won't work here. For one thing, many employers will just fire people for not showing up that day. The rest will just dock their pay. In Europe, workers have protections, unions, and worker friendly governments. We have none of that here.

Whatever economic impact will be minimal. Whatever people didn't buy that day, they'll buy the next.

A General Strike hurts us, and is intended to make the government feel empathy for us, and give us what we want. The MAGA government won't budge after weeks of a government shutdown, you think they'll budge after a General Strike of ONE DAY?

IN America, we have a mechanism that European nations don't have - we can literally turn off the government a spigot, and EVERYTHING comes to a halt very quickly. We keep going to work, collecting our paychecks, stimulating the economy, but they stop their atrocities, for the most part.

We can do that, Europe can't. General Strikes will work for them, they won't work for us. Why hurt ourselves, when we can hurt those who are causing the problems?

MAGA isn't going to act to alleviate our pain, exactly the opposite. They are sadistic, if they see someone in pain, their very first impulse is to increase that pain.

But inflict pain on them, and they scream like the cowardly little weenies they are. And nothing is more painful to these corrupt traitors that taking away their money. Let's make them scream real loud.

[–] polle@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago

As if a company will wire 100% of their staff when nobody is showing up.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 51 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (6 children)

The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. It's cliché, but true and applies here.

"One day at a time" works for people who are recovering from addiction to substances. Why couldn't it help people recover from addiction to capitalism? Consumption is consumption.

"Just for today, I won't drink alcohol" can easily become "Just for today, I won't consume corporate products", "Just for today, I'll hold the picket line", "Just for today, I'll tighten my belt and live off bare essentials."

One day gives people a taste of what's possible without being a major deterrent or barrier to folks who can't afford to miss work for a week or a month. If it's successful, it demonstrates proof of concept and makes similar future actions more likely. It also shows the structures of power what we're capable of, puts them off balance a bit, and builds worker power.

People saying "what we really need is ______" are a bane to the movement that's happening. I'm not saying you're doing it on purpose, but don't fall for that rhetoric. A lot of it is coming from plants attempting to discredit and derail the movement.

Actions being done now are always more effective than hypothetical actions that "should be done," and they build towards greater action. Don't expect immediate perfection, because you'll always be disappointed. It's necessary to start somewhere, and this is a great place to start. If you want to be part of it, grab ahold and run with it. Otherwise, stay out of the way, and above all don't cross the picket line.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 27 points 17 hours ago

Ok let’s try one day first. You know, get our legs under us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca -2 points 7 hours ago

Hahahaha I'll believe it when it happens. Americas response has been very lackluster. We well have to start calling the the land of the meek I hope this shatters their cowboy image they have of themselves. And they definitely have to stop calling the French cowards and should be looking at to them for how to protest.

load more comments
view more: next ›